Bombay High Court
SAKRU THANU CHAVANversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR/SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AURANGABAD AND ANR
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SHAILESH P BRAHME
Holding
The Court held that the delay may be condoned, but the petitioners are not entitled to statutory benefits or interest for the delayed period.
Summary
The petitioners, Trimbak Thanu Chavan and others, filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 4,394‑day delay in preferring their first appeals. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra through the Collector/Special Land Acquisition Officer, contested the application. The Court examined whether such an extensive delay could be justified and whether the petitioners were entitled to statutory benefits and interest for the delayed period. Finding no evidence of an oblique motive on the part of the petitioners, the Court allowed the condonation of delay but expressly denied any statutory benefits or interest. The application was consequently allowed on the condition that the petitioners forgo the interest and statutory benefits, and the matter was set for final disposal.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 4,394 days in filing first appeals can be condoned under the applicable procedural law.
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to statutory benefits and interest for the period of delay.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- first appeal
- statutory benefits
- interest
- civil procedure
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH
AT AURANGABAD
76 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7489 OF 2025
IN FAST/12911/2025
TRIMBAK THANU CHAVAN
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR/
SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, AURANGABAD AND
ANR
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7490 OF 2025
IN FAST/12912/2025
...
Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Kanawade Ajay T.
AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. S. N. Morampalle.
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 18.03.2026
PER COURT :-
1. Heard both sides.
2. Applicants seek to condone delay of 4394 days in
preferring first appeals.
3. Application is contested by the respondents. There is no
reason to infer any oblique motive on the part of the applicants
to cause delay. Applicants are ready to forego the interest and
statutory benefits for the delayed period. The delay stands
condone.
4. Civil applications are allowed on condition that
applicants shall not be entitled to statutory benefits and the
interest for the delayed period.
First Appeals
5. Issue notice for final disposal to the respondents at the
admission stage, returnable on 15.04.2026.
6. Learned AGP waives service of notice for
respondent/State.
7. Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned
Court.
8. Print is dispensed with.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
...
vmk/-
Checking your session…