Bombay High Court
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTDversusJYOTI DATTATRAY SHELAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute
- Bench
- SANJAY A DESHMUKH
Holding
The court stayed the execution of the judgment and award and condoned the delay in filing the first appeal, finding no deliberate intent and acting in the interest of justice.
Summary
The applicant filed an application seeking a stay of execution of a judgment and award, claiming the entire amount was already deposited with the court. The court allowed the stay as per the prayer clause. A separate application for withdrawal of the amount was listed, and another application sought condonation of an 83‑day delay in filing the first appeal. The respondent opposed the condonation, but the court found the delay was neither deliberate nor intentional and granted it in the interest of justice. Consequently, the civil applications were allowed and disposed of, and notice for the first appeal was issued, with service of notice waived for certain respondents.
Issues considered
- Whether the execution of the impugned judgment and award should be stayed.
- Whether the 83‑day delay in filing the first appeal should be condoned.
Subjects
- stay of execution
- condonation of delay
- civil application
- first appeal
- interest of justice
Judgment
27 CA NO. 812 OF 2026.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
27 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 812 OF 2026
IN FAST/19807/2025
Jyoti Dattatray Shelar And Others
VERSUS
New India Assurance Company Limited
...
Mr. D. R. Jayabhar, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. D. Tele h/for Mr. Ramesh Imale, Advocate for Respondent
No.10
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7594 OF 2025
IN FAST/19807/2025 WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7595 OF 2025
IN FAST/19807/2025
….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 04.03.2026
PER COURT :-
APPLICATION FOR STAY
1. This is an application seeking stay to the execution of
the impugned judgment and award.
2. The learned advocate for the applicant / appellant
submits that the entire amount as per the impugned judgment and
award is deposited in this Court.
3. In view of the above, the application is allowed in terms
of prayer clause ‘B’ and disposed of.
1 of 3
(( 2 )) 27 CA NO. 812 OF 2026
APPLICATION FOR WITHDRAWAL OF AMOUNT
. List the application on 09.03.2026 at 02:30 P.M.
APPLICATION FOR DELAY
1. Heard the learned Advocates for the parties.
2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 83 days
caused in filing the first appeal.
3. The learned Advocate for respondent strongly opposed
the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to
condone the delay.
4. Perused the application. For the reasons stated therein,
the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice as the
delay is neither deliberate nor intentional. Hence, the following
order:
::ORDER::
a. Civil Application is allowed and disposed of.
b. The delay of 83 days caused in filing the first appeal is
condoned.
2 of 3
(( 3 )) 27 CA NO. 812 OF 2026
FIRST APPEAL
1. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on
24.06.2026.
2. Mr. D. R. Jayabhar, learned Advocate waives service of
notice for Respondent Nos.1 to 5.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ]
HRJadhav
3 of 3
Checking your session…