Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAMADHAN NANA SHINDEversusTHE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA THR THE GENERAL MANAGER AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court ordered the application for recall to be stood over to 28 August 2026, pending argument.

Summary

The applicant, Samadhan Nana Shinde, filed an application seeking recall of the order dated 24 June 2026 that dismissed his writ petition in default. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Rajendra S. Sadaphule, was prepared to argue the matter on the next date. The Court directed that the matter be stood over to 28 August 2026 in urgent category. The Court further warned that if the writ petition is not argued on the next date, the application itself would be dismissed. No substantive merits were addressed, and the order remains pending pending argument on the adjourned date.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order dismissing the writ petition in default can be recalled
  • Whether the application for recall should be entertained despite default

Subjects

  • recall of order
  • default dismissal
  • writ petition
  • civil procedure
  • adjournment

Judgment

                                 1               9-CA 7822-2026.odt



          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD
                  CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 7822 OF 2026
                           IN WP/13671/2018

Samadhan Nana Shinde                                        .. Applicant
         Versus
The Government Of India
Through The General Manager And Others                      .. Respondents

Mr. Rajendra S. Sadaphule, Advocate for Applicant.
Mr. A. S. Shinde, Addl. G.P. for Respondents-State.
Mr. M. N. Navandar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                  AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ.
                          DATE       :   31st JULY, 2026.
PER COURT :-

1.       This application is filed seeking recall of order dated

24.06.2026 dismissing the petition in default.                The learned

advocate for the applicant/petitioner is ready to argue the matter

on the next date.

2.       Stand over to 28.08.2026 in urgent category.

3.       If the writ petition is not argued on the next date, this

application would also be dismissed.


( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.)                     ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )


P.S.B.


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.