Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

sayyed Isak Mahemud Alias Isak Mahemmud SayyadversusThe Union of India Through General Manager

Disposal
Admitted/Allowed/Granted/Rule Absolute

Holding

The application is allowed conditionally, subject to the applicant removing all office objections within four weeks, otherwise the impugned order remains in force.

Summary

The petitioner, Sayyed Isak Mahemud, filed a civil application (No. 8577 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an order dated 28 April 2026 passed by the Registrar (Judicial). The applicant sought relief to set aside or modify the impugned order on the ground of pending office objections. The Court, after hearing the applicant’s counsel, examined the application and the reasons provided. It allowed the application conditionally, directing the applicant to remove all office objections within four weeks from the date of the order. The Court further stipulated that if the applicant fails to comply, the original order dated 28 April 2026 shall continue to govern the proceedings. No statutory provisions or precedent were cited in the short judgment.

Issues considered

  • Whether the impugned order dated 28‑04‑2026 should be set aside or modified pending removal of office objections?
  • Whether the applicant must clear all office objections before the relief can take effect?

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • ex parte objections
  • conditional relief
  • court order
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:34217
                                                                                  953-ca-8577-2026.odt
                                                          (1)


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                    CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8577 OF 2026
                                           IN X-OBJST/7244/2026

                              Sayyed Isak Mahemud Alias Isak Mahemmud Sayyad
                                                    VERSUS
                                 The Union Of India Through General Manager
                                                        ...
                              Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Shirasath Suhas Rajendra
                                                          ...
                                                  CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.
                                                  DATED : AUGUST 06, 2026

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.               Heard learned advocate appearing for applicant.

                 2.               Perused   application         and   reasons   stated    therein.

                 Considering same, application is allowed, subject to condition that

                 applicant removes all office objections within a period of four weeks

                 from today.

                 3.               In case of failure to remove office objections, impugned

                 order dated 28.04.2026 passed by Registrar (Judicial) of this Court

                 shall govern the proceeding.




                                                                (S.G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.)




                 Mujaheed//


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.