Bombay High Court
SUDAM SAMPATRAO WAGHversusYADAV DEVJI BHAVALE
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SHAILESH P BRAHME
Holding
The appeal was held to be infructuous and was disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Sudam Sampatrao Wagh, appealed against Order No. 48 of 2023 which involved a remand. After the impugned order, the underlying suit was decided on 13 January 2026, as evidenced by a copy of the judgment tendered. Because the suit had been finally decided, the appeal became infructuous. The court therefore disposed of the appeal. Additionally, the pending civil application No. 9013 of 2023 was also disposed.
Subjects
- appeal
- remand
- infructuous
- civil application
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:2008
56 AO 48 OF 2023.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
56 APEAL FROM ORDER NO. 48 OF 2023
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9013 OF 2023
IN AO/48/2023
SUDAM SAMPATRAO WAGH
VERSUS
YADAV DEVJI BHAVALE
...
Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Thombre Chandrakant V.
Advocate for Respondent : Mr. Mahesh K. Bhosale
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 17.01.2026
PER COURT :
It is informed by both sides that after the impugned order of remand,
the suit is decided vide judgment dated 13.01.2026. A copy of the judgment
is tendered on record.
2. Appeal from Order has become infructuous, it is disposed of.
3. Pending Civil Application is disposed of.
( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
mkd/-
1/1
Checking your session…