Bombay High Court
GANESH MARUTI YEMULVADversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court condoned the 26‑day delay in filing the review application.
Summary
Ganesh Maruti Yemulvad filed a civil application seeking condonation of a 26‑day delay in filing a review application against the State of Maharashtra. The applicant argued that there was no contest to the averments in the application and that condonation was appropriate. The respondents did not oppose the request. The Bench examined whether the delay could be condoned under the principles of equity and procedural law. Finding no substantive objection, the Court held that the delay was excusable. Consequently, the civil application was allowed and the delay was formally condoned, with directions to register the review application.
Issues considered
- Whether a delay of 26 days in filing a review application can be condoned.
Subjects
- condonation
- delay
- review application
- civil procedure
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:7966-DB
(1) 901 CA 913 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 913 OF 2026
IN RAST/30305/2024
GANESH MARUTI YEMULVAD
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND
OTHERS
...
Mr. N. B. Jadhav, Advocate for Applicant
Mr. S. V. Hange, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 and 2
…
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME AND
RAJNISH R. VYAS, JJ.
Dated : February 20, 2026
PER COURT :-
. The applicant seeks to condone delay of 26 days in filing the
review application.
2. There is no contest to the averments of the application. It is
desirable to condone the delay.
3. Civil Application is allowed. The delay stands condoned.
4. Office to register the review application.
( RAJNISH R. VYAS, J. ) ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
PRW
Checking your session…