Bombay High Court
SHRI. SANTOSH TULJARAM KENDALEversusSMT. JYOTI AMARLAL MEGHANI
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal and the civil application were dismissed as infructuous because the original suit had already been disposed.
Summary
The appellant, Santosh Tuljaram Kendale, filed an appeal against Order (ST) No. 35619 of 2018 along with Civil Application No. 1096 of 2018. The original suit underlying the appeal had been disposed of on 12 November 2022. The appellant contended that the appeal should still be heard despite the disposal of the suit. The court examined the procedural position and observed that with the final disposal of the suit, there was no substantive matter left for adjudication. Accordingly, the appeal and the accompanying civil application were held infructuous and were disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal from an order remains maintainable when the original suit has already been disposed?
Subjects
- appeal
- infructuous
- civil procedure
- order disposal
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:611
Sayyed 17-AO(ST).35619.2018.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER (ST) NO.35619 OF 2018
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1096 OF 2018
Santosh Tuljaram Kendale ...Appellant/Applicant
Versus
Jyoti Amarlal Meghani ...Respondent
_____________________________________________________
Mr. Manoj M. Badgujar for the Appellant/Applicant.
_____________________________________________________
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATE : 08 JANUARY 2026
P.C.:
1. The learned counsel for the appellant states that the original
suit has been disposed of on 12 November 2022.
2. In view of above, nothing survives in the Appeal From Order.
Therefore, the Appeal From Order and the Civil Application therein are
disposed of as having become infructuous.
[ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]
Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 08/01/2026 15:14:04 1 of 1
Checking your session…