Bombay High Court
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAYversusSHRI. ARUN CHHOTALAL CHATRAPATI AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that the application for a stay was infructuous and dismissed it.
Summary
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay sought a stay of an order that had been in force since 2014. The High Court noted that no stay had been granted on the impugned order since that time. Consequently, the civil application filed in 2016 for a stay was deemed infructuous. The Court therefore disposed of the application without granting any relief. The judgment was delivered by Justice Jitendra Jain on 17 January 2026.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil application for a stay of the order dated 2014 can be entertained
Subjects
- stay of order
- civil procedure
- appellate jurisdiction
- municipal corporation
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:2094
Sayyed 26-(i)CAF.1468.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1468 OF 2016
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.1809 OF 2019
Municipal Corporation of
Greater Bombay ...Applicant/Appellant
Versus
Arun Chhotalal Chatrapati & Ors. ...Respondents
_____________________________________________________
Mr. Pradeep M. Patil for the Applicant-Appellant-MCGM.
Mr. Bhavik Manek a/w Mr. Aryan Srivastava i/by Wadia Ghandy & Co.
for Respondents.
_____________________________________________________
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATE : 17 JANUARY 2026
P.C.:
1. There is no stay on the impugned order since 2014.
2. Therefore, civil application for stay has become infructuous
and is disposed of accordingly.
[ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]
Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 17/01/2026 15:13:56 1 of 1
Checking your session…