Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. KAIZAR TAHER MITHAIWALLAversusMR. VIVEK BANARSIDAS GULATI AND ANR.

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Kaizar Taher Mithaiwalla filed a first appeal (ST No.32645 of 2015) before the High Court of Bombay against Vivek Banarsidas Gulati & Anr. No party appeared on 5 February 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal. The same situation persisted on 12 February 2026, when the court again noted the absence of the appellant. The court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, deeming it abandoned. Consequently, the pending civil applications No.1724 of 2016 and No.3636 of 2017 were ordered to be disposed of. The judgment underscores the procedural requirement that a party must actively prosecute an appeal for it to continue.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when an appellant fails to appear and prosecute a pending appeal?

Subjects

  • civil appeal
  • dismissal for want of prosecution
  • procedural default
  • civil applications disposed
  • High Court of Bombay

Judgment

                      Sayyed                                                          4-FA(ST).32645.2015.doc


                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SAYYED
         Digitally
         signed by
                                        FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.32645 OF 2015
SAEED    SAYYED
         SAEED ALI                                     WITH
ALI      AHMED ALI
         Date:
AHMED    2026.02.13                     CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1724 OF 2016
ALI      16:26:30
         +0530
                                                       WITH
                                        CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3636 OF 2017

                      Kaizar Taher Mithaiwalla               ...Appellant/Applicant
                            Versus
                      Vivek Banarsidas Gulati & Anr.         ...Respondents
                            _____________________________________________________
                      None for the Appellant/Applicant.
                      None for the Respondents.
                           _____________________________________________________

                                                       CORAM :          JITENDRA JAIN, J.
                                                       DATE        :    12 FEBRUARY 2026
                      P.C.:

                      1.        On 5 February 2026, none appeared for the appellant-
                      applicant. Therefore, the matter was listed today for ‘dismissal’. Today
                      also, same position continues.


                      2.        First   Appeal   is    dismissed       for     want   of   prosecution.
                      Consequently, civil applications do not survive and are disposed of.



                                                                             [ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]




                                                          1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.