Bombay High Court
BHUMIKA TRANSPORTversusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER MUMBAI
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that a valid arbitration agreement subsists and has been duly invoked, warranting the appointment of a sole arbitrator.
Summary
The applicant, Bhumika Transport, invoked an arbitration clause in a tender document and issued a notice on 3 October 2025 seeking arbitration against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The respondent failed to reply or file an affidavit. The High Court examined whether the arbitration agreement was valid and whether the pre‑arbitration requirements had been complied with, noting that a prior order dated 3 July 2026 had removed any objection on pre‑arbitration mechanisms. Satisfied that a subsisting arbitration agreement existed and had been properly invoked, the Court appointed Ms. Ayushi Anandpara Parekh as the sole arbitrator. The Court also directed procedural steps for disclosure, communication, and cost allocation, while leaving all substantive issues to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
Issues considered
- Whether a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement exists between the parties under the Tender Document and General Conditions of Contract.
- Whether the applicant complied with the pre‑arbitration procedural requirements under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Legislation cited
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11, 11(8), 12(1)
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Section 11 application
- Arbitration agreement
- Tender contract
- Commercial litigation
- Mumbai
- Arbitral appointment
Judgment
42-i-carap-195-2026.doc
SHABNOOR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
SHABNOOR COMM ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO.195 OF 2026
AYUB
PATHAN
Bhumika Transport … Applicant
Digitally signed by
SHABNOOR AYUB
PATHAN
V/s.
Date: 2026.08.21
18:58:26 +0530
Municipal Corporation of Greater
Mumbai … Respondent
Mr. Ranjeev Carvalho a/w Mr. Rishab Murali,
Mr.Sabeena Mahadik and Pankaj Uttaradhi for
Applicant.
Ms. Pooja Yadav a/w Komal Punjabi, for Respondent
– BMC.
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 21, 2026
P.C.:
1. The present Application has been filed under Section 11 of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred
to as “the Act”, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for
adjudication of the disputes and differences arising between the
parties under the Tender Document read with the General
Conditions of Contract for Construction Work, 2016. The
arbitration agreement between the parties is contained in
Section 9 of the Tender Document read with amended Clause
13(e) of the General Conditions of Contract for Construction
Work, 2016. In the interest of brevity, the arbitration agreement
1
42-i-carap-195-2026.doc
is not reproduced herein. It is sufficient to note that this Court
has jurisdiction to entertain and decide the present Application.
2. The record indicates that the Applicant invoked the
arbitration agreement by issuing a notice dated 3 October 2025.
Despite service of the said notice, the Respondents have neither
furnished any reply thereto nor filed any affidavit in reply to the
present Application.
3. Upon perusal of the material placed on record, it is evident
that the Applicant has duly invoked the arbitration agreement in
accordance with its terms.
4. In view of the order dated 3 July 2026 passed by this
Court in the present proceedings, the objection regarding the
alleged non-compliance with the pre-arbitration mechanism
does not survive for consideration. All other objections and
contentions are expressly kept open to be raised before the
learned Arbitral Tribunal in accordance with law.
5. This Court is satisfied that a valid and subsisting
arbitration agreement exists between the parties and that the
same has been duly invoked by the Applicant. It would,
therefore, be appropriate to refer the disputes and differences
arising out of or in connection with the Tender Document and
the General Conditions of Contract referred to above to
arbitration before a Sole Arbitrator.
6. In the aforesaid circumstances, the present Application
filed under Section 11 of the Act is disposed of in terms of the
2
42-i-carap-195-2026.doc
following order:
A) Ayushi Anandpara Parekh, Advocate of this
court, is hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to
adjudicate upon the disputes and differences
between the parties arising out of and in connection
with the Agreement referred to above; Office
Address:- C/o Rohaan Cama, Office Nos. 17-18, 1st
Floor, Islam Building, Veer Nariman Road, Fort,
Mumbai – 400 001, Contact No. - 9833144496.
Email - [email protected].
B) A copy of this Order will be communicated
to the Learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates
for the Applicant within a period of one week
from today. The Applicant shall provide the
contact and communication particulars of the
parties to the Arbitral Tribunal along with a copy
of this Order;
C) The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to
forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure
under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of
the Act to the Advocates for the Applicant so as
to enable them to file the same in the Registry of
this Court. The Registry of this Court shall retain
the said Statement on the file of this Applicant
and a copy of the same shall be furnished by the
3
42-i-carap-195-2026.doc
Advocates for the Applicant to the Advocates for
the Respondent;
D) The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to
forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure
under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of
the Act to the parties within a period of two
weeks from receipt of a copy of this Order;
E) The parties shall appear before the
Learned Sole Arbitrator on such date and at such
place as indicated, to obtain appropriate
directions with regard to conduct of the
arbitration including fixing a schedule for
pleadings, examination of witnesses, if any,
schedule of hearings etc. At such meeting, the
parties shall provide a valid and functional email
address along with mobile and landline numbers
of the respective Advocates of the parties to the
Arbitral Tribunal. Communications to such
email addresses shall constitute valid service of
correspondence in connection with the
arbitration;
F) All arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitral
Tribunal as per Schedule IV shall be borne by the
parties equally in the first instance, and shall be
subject to any final Award that may be passed by
the Tribunal in relation to costs.
4
42-i-carap-195-2026.doc
7. All issues on merits are expressly kept open to be agitated
before the arbitral tribunal appointed hereby.
8. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order
shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available
on this Court’s website.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
5
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.