Bombay High Court
Kalpataru Projects International LimitedversusMs Krupay Industries
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court appointed Mr. Rubin Vakil as the sole arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.
Summary
Kalpataru International Projects Ltd. filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking the appointment of an arbitrator to resolve disputes arising from a work order dated 14 October 2024 with Krupay Industries. The parties had an arbitration clause (Clause 21) in their agreement requiring a sole arbitrator for such disputes, and the applicant had issued a notice of arbitration on 24 April 2026. The High Court examined the existence of a valid arbitration agreement and the parties' consent to refer the matter to arbitration. The Court appointed Mr. Rubin Vakil, an advocate of the Court, as the sole arbitrator and directed procedural steps including disclosure statements and cost sharing. All substantive issues, including limitation, were left open for determination by the arbitrator, and the application was disposed of by the appointment order.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court should appoint a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
- Whether the arbitration agreement in Clause 21 is enforceable and sufficient to refer the disputes to arbitration.
Legislation cited
- Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — s. 11, 11(8), 12(1)
Subjects
- Arbitration
- Section 11
- Arbitration agreement
- Sole arbitrator
- Commercial dispute
- Cost allocation
- Statement of Disclosure
Judgment
45-CARAP-585-26-F.doc
Sayali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMM. ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO. 585 OF 2026
Kalpataru International Projects Limited … Applicant
V/s.
M/s. Krupay Industries … Respondents
SAYALI Ms. Shivani Kumbhojkar with Giripriya PM i/b The
DEEPAK Law Point, for Applicant.
UPASANI
Mr. Aayush Kothari i/b Sanjay Udeshi and Co., for
Digitally signed by
SAYALI DEEPAK Respondents.
UPASANI
Date: 2026.08.28
18:34:29 +0530
CORAM : AMIT BORKAR, J.
DATED : AUGUST 28, 2026
P.C.:
1. The present Application has been filed under Section 11 of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, hereinafter referred
to as “the Act”, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator for
adjudication of the disputes and differences stated to have
arisen between the parties in connection with the Work Order
dated 14th October, 2024 at Ex. A annexed to the petition. The
arbitration agreement between the parties is contained in Clause
21 thereof, which is placed on record at page 19.1 of the
Application. In the interest of brevity, the said arbitration clause
is not reproduced herein. It would suffice to observe that the
present Application is within the territorial jurisdiction of this
Court.
1
45-CARAP-585-26-F.doc
2. It appears from the record that the Applicant invoked the
arbitration agreement by issuing a notice dated 24th April, 2026.
3. By consent of the parties, the disputes and differences
arising out of and in connection with the Work Order dated 14th
October, 2024 at Ex. A annexed to the petition are required to be
referred for adjudication to arbitration by a Sole Arbitrator.
4. In view of the aforesaid, the present Application filed
under Section 11 of the Act is disposed of by passing the
following order:
A) Mr. Rubin Vakil, an advocate of this Court, is
hereby appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to
adjudicate upon the disputes and differences
between the parties arising out of and in
connection with the Agreement referred to above;
Office Address:- 402, Haman House, Ambalal Doshi
Marg, Fort, Mumbai – 400 001..
Email – [email protected]
B) A copy of this Order will be communicated to
the Learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates for
the Applicant within a period of one week from
today. The Applicant shall provide the contact and
communication particulars of the parties to the
Arbitral Tribunal along with a copy of this Order;
C) The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to
forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure
2
45-CARAP-585-26-F.doc
under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the
Act to the Advocates for the Applicant so as to
enable them to file the same in the Registry of this
Court. The Registry of this Court shall retain the
said Statement on the file of this Applicant and a
copy of the same shall be furnished by the
Advocates for the Applicant to the Advocates for
the Respondent;
D) The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to
forward the statutory Statement of Disclosure
under Section 11(8) read with Section 12(1) of the
Act to the parties within a period of two weeks
from receipt of a copy of this Order;
E)The parties shall appear before the Learned Sole
Arbitrator on such date and at such place as
indicated, to obtain appropriate directions with
regard to conduct of the arbitration including fixing
a schedule for pleadings, examination of witnesses,
if any, schedule of hearings etc. At such meeting,
the parties shall provide a valid and functional
email address along with mobile and landline
numbers of the respective Advocates of the parties
to the Arbitral Tribunal. Communications to such
email addresses shall constitute valid service of
correspondence in connection with the arbitration;
F) All arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitral Tribunal
3
45-CARAP-585-26-F.doc
shall be borne by the parties equally in the first
instance, and shall be subject to any final Award
that may be passed by the Tribunal in relation to
costs.
5. All issues on merits including limitation are expressly
kept open to be agitated before the arbitral tribunal appointed
hereby.
6. All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order
shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available
on this Court’s website.
(AMIT BORKAR, J.)
4
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.