Bombay High Court
1. GARFIELD JOHNSON CARVALHO and OTHERSversus1. MRS. MERCY ANDREWS D'SOUZA and OTHERS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Allowed
- Bench
- GAURI GODSE
Holding
The Court condoned the delay and allowed the amendment to bring on record the heirs of the deceased respondent.
Summary
The applicants sought to bring on record the heirs and legal representatives of a deceased respondent in a pending civil application for condonation of delay. The respondents opposed, alleging the applicants should have known of the death. The Court examined the applicants' sworn statement that they were unaware of the death until notified and found no contrary evidence. Consequently, the Court found no reason to reject the condonation of delay. The delay was condoned, and the applicants were permitted to amend the pleadings to include the heirs as parties. The application was allowed, with the amendment to be effected within three weeks.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in seeking to bring on record the heirs of a deceased respondent can be condoned.
- Whether the Court may permit amendment of the civil application to include the heirs as parties.
Subjects
- condonation of delay
- amendment of pleadings
- heirs
- civil procedure
- high court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:16860
13-CAS-852-2015.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 852 OF 2015
Swapnil
IN
SECOND APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 13377 OF 2014
Garfield Johnson Carvalho and Ors. … Applicants
Vs.
Mercy Andrews D’souza and Ors. … Respondents
Mr. Sanjay S. Naik i/b. Mr. R. D. Suryawanshi for the
applicants.
Mr. Anil D’Souza a/w. Mr. Ernest Tuscano a/w. Mr. Mark
Dbritto for respondent nos. 2B to 2F.
Mr. Prathmesh Seth a/w. Mr. Joseph Fernandes and Ms.
Trupti Gosavi for respondent nos. 5 to 7.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 8th APRIL 2026
ORDER :
1. This application is to bring on record heirs and legal
representatives of deceased respondent no.2.
2. This application is opposed on behalf of the respondent
no.2B to 2F. Learned counsel for the respondents submits
that the applicants are their cousins, it is unbelievable that
the applicants were unaware about the death of respondent
no.2.
1/2
13-CAS-852-2015.docx
3. I have perused the application, the applicants have
stated in paragraph 6 that they were unaware about the
death of respondent no.2 and immediately after receipt of the
intimation received from their advocate about the service
report, they have applied for bringing on record the names of
heirs and legal representatives. There is no reply filed to the
application disputing the correctness of the statements made
on oath in paragraph 6 of the application. I do not see any
reason to disbelieve the grounds raised for condonation of
delay.
4. For the reasons stated in the application delay is
condoned.
5. Applicants are permitted to bring on record the names
of respondent nos.2B to 2F as the heirs and legal
representatives of deceased respondent no.2 in Civil
Application No. 1396 of 2014 which is filed for condonation of
delay in filing the second appeal.
6. The civil application is allowed in the aforesaid terms.
7. Amendment to be carried out within three weeks.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
2/2
Checking your session…