Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHRI.RAVINDRA NARAYAN DHAMDHERE (THROUGH POA) SHRI.KRIPASHANKAR BANSILAL JOSHIversusSHRI.ARVIND NARAYAN DHAMDHERE (THROUGH LRS) AND OTHERS

Decided
Disposal
Allowed

Holding

The court granted an interim stay of possession while allowing execution proceedings to continue pending the appeal.

Summary

The applicant, Ravindra Narayan Dhamdhere, filed an interim application seeking a stay of execution and implementation of a judgment dated 3 April 2018 in a partition suit. The applicant argued that possession should not be handed over pending the hearing and final disposal of the second appeal. The court noted that while execution proceedings may continue, possession should be withheld until the appeal is decided. No opposition was filed against the interim relief. Consequently, the court allowed the interim application, staying possession but permitting execution, and disposed of the application on those terms.

Issues considered

  • Whether an interim stay of execution and possession can be granted pending the final disposal of a second appeal in a partition suit

Subjects

  • stay of execution
  • partition suit
  • interim relief
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • possession

Judgment

          Digitally signed
          by SHAGUFTA
SHAGUFTA QUTBUDDIN
          PATHAN
QUTBUDDIN
          Date:
PATHAN    2026.04.29                                                           32-CAS-918-2019.doc
          19:53:16
          +0530
                                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         CIVIL APPLICATION NO.918 OF 2019
                                                     (For Stay)
                                                         IN
                                          SECOND APPEAL NO.459 OF 2020

                      Ravindra Narayan Dhamdhere
                      Through the Power of Attorney Holder
                      Kripashankar Bansilal Joshi                              ...Applicant
                                Versus
                      Arvind Narayan Dhamdhere
                      Through legal heirs 1/1 & 1/2 And Others                 ...Respondents

                                                     ——————
                      Mr. G. S. Godbole, Sr. Advocate i/b Mr. Vijay V. Nene for the Applicant

                      Mr. Rajendra Jagtap a/w Mr. Rushikesh S. Kekane for the Respondent
                      Nos.1 and 2
                                                ——————

                                                 CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
                                                 DATE     : APRIL 28, 2026


                      P. C. :

                      1.        Interim Application has been preferred seeking stay of the

                      execution and implementation of the judgment and decree dated 3 rd

                      April 2018. As the Suit is for partition and separate possession, the

                      execution proceedings can be permitted to go on, however, the

                      possession not to be handed over, pending the hearing and :nal

                      disposal of the present Second Appeal.


          SQ Pathan                                                                             1/2
                                                               32-CAS-918-2019.doc


            2.   There is no opposition to the said order being passed by this

            Court. Resultantly, Interim Application is allowed and disposed of in

            the above terms.



                                               [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]




SQ Pathan                                                                     2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.