Bombay High Court
MANOHAR KRISHNAJI MUGDUM (DESD) LRS.versusMAHAVIR NIWAS TENANTS ASSOCIATION and ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- ABHAY AHUJA
Holding
The court permitted the amendment of the writ petition to include respondents No.3 and No.4, subject to a six‑week deadline.
Summary
The applicant filed a civil application seeking permission to add proposed respondents No.3 and No.4 to an existing writ petition, relying on a Will Deed dated 10 January 2000. The respondent No.2 was represented by S. D. Rayrikar, AGP, while the applicant was represented by Vijay Killedar. The court examined the submissions and found that the applicant had made out a case for allowing the amendment. Accordingly, the judge ordered that the amendment be effected within six weeks, failing which the application would be dismissed. The court also directed service of notice to the newly added respondents by private notice, RPAD or hand delivery, and required an affidavit of service. The civil application was thereafter disposed of as allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant may be permitted to amend the writ petition to add respondents No.3 and No.4 based on the Will Deed dated 10.01.2000
Subjects
- amendment of writ petition
- addition of respondents
- civil application
- procedural law
- service of notice
Judgment
7.2552.03-caw
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.2552/2003
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.2848/1991
Office Notes, Office Court’s or Judge’s orders
Memoranda of Coram,
Appearances, court’s
orders or directions
and Registrar’s orders
Mr. Vijay Killedar for the applicant
Mr. S. D. Rayrikar, AGP for the respondent No.2.
CORAM : K. K. TATED, J.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 2, 2016
P.C.:
1. Heard. By the Civil Application, the applicant
seeks permission to bring on record the proposed
respondent Nos.3 and 4 as respondent Nos.3 and 4
in Writ Petition on the basis of Will Deed dated
10.01.2000.
2. Considering the submissions made by the
learned counsel for the Applicant and the
averments made in the Application, I am satisfied
that the Applicant has made out a case for allowing
the present Civil Application.
3. Hence, the following order:
Basavraj G Patil 1/2
7.2552.03-caw
a) The applicant is permitted to bring on record
the proposed respondent Nos.3 and 4 as
respondent Nos.3 and 4 in Writ Petition within six
weeks from today, failing which the Civil
Application shall stand dismissed without further
reference to the court.
b) If amendment is carried out within stipulated
time as stated hereinabove, the office is directed to
issue notice to the added respondent in Writ
Petition, returnable after six weeks.
c) In addition to usual mode of service, the
applicant is permitted to serve the added
Respondents in Writ Petition along with entire
proceedings by way of private notice either by
RPAD and/or by hand delivery and to file an
Affidavit of service to that effect on or before next
date.
d) Applicant is directed to serve a copy of
amended petition on other respondents and/or
their advocates.
e) Civil application stands disposed off
accordingly.
JUDGE
Basavraj G Patil 2/2
Checking your session…