Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GL CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTDversusNAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The High Court, finding an enforceable arbitration clause and compliance with statutory requirements, exercised its power under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act to appoint a sole arbitrator and direct the conduct of the arbitration, ordering the petitioner to bear the arbitral costs.

Summary

GL Constructions Pvt. Ltd. filed a commercial arbitration petition seeking the appointment of an arbitrator under the arbitration clause in its agreement with Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. The court found no dispute that the clause existed and that a notice invoking arbitration had been served. Relying on Sections 11(8) and 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court appointed retired Justice R.Y. Ganoo as the sole arbitrator and issued detailed procedural directions, including disclosure requirements and communication protocols. The court directed that all arbitral costs and fees be borne by the petitioner. The petition was disposed of in accordance with these orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can appoint a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
  • Whether the costs of the arbitration may be ordered to be borne by the petitioner

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Arbitration
  • Appointment of arbitrator
  • Commercial arbitration
  • Arbitral costs
  • Section 11(8) Arbitration Act
  • Section 12(1) Arbitration Act
  • High Court

Judgment

                      LSP                                   1              908 coarp 30.26.doc


                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   Commercial Arbitration Petition No.30 of 2026

                      GL Constructions Pvt. Ltd.                         …       Petitioner
                           v/s.
                      Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation                  …       Respondents


                      Mr. Hasmit Trivedi a/w. Mr.           Advocate for the Petitioner.
                      Murtaza Bohra i/b. Praxis Legal
                      Mr. Tejesh Dande                     Advocate for the Respondents
                                                           NMMC.

                                                   CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J

                                                     DATE : 28th August 2026.

                      P.C. :

                      1.        Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned
                      Advocate for the Respondent Corporation.

                      2.        There is no dispute that there is an arbitration clause in the
                      agreement. Already a notice dated 31 st July 2025 is issued by the
         Digitally


LATA
SUNIL
         signed by
         LATA
         SUNIL
         PANJWANI
                      Petitioner invoking the arbitration clause. Clause No.116 is
PANJWANI Date:
         2026.08.29
         13:37:29
         +0530
                      arbitration clause on Page No.115.            Basic requirements for
                      appointment of Arbitrator are made out.          Hence, the following
                      order:
                                                       ORDER

                           A)     Justice R.Y.Ganoo, Retired Judge of this Court is hereby
LSP                                2               908 coarp 30.26.doc


         appointed as the Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon the
         disputes and differences between the parties arising out
         and in connection with the the matter referred above;
       Office address :-Office No.19, Rohit Chambers,
                       Jamabhoomi Marg, Mumbai 400001
       Email id :     - [email protected]
       Contact no.    - 9820167959

  B)     A copy of this Order will be communicated to the
         Learned Sole Arbitrator by the Advocates for the
         Petitioner within a period of one week from the date of
         upload of this order. The petitioner shall provide the
         contact and communication particulars of the parties to
         the Arbitral Tribunal along with a copy of this Order;

  C) The Learned Sole Arbitrator is requested to forward the
         statutory Statement of Disclosure under Section 11(8)
         read with Section 12(1) of the Act to the parties within a
         period of two weeks from receipt of a copy of this Order;

  D)     The parties shall appear before the Learned Sole
         Arbitrator on such date and at such place as indicated, to
         obtain appropriate directions with regard to conduct of
         the arbitration including fixing a schedule for pleadings,
         examination of witnesses, if any, schedule of hearings etc.
         At such meeting, the parties shall provide a valid and
         functional email address along with mobile and landline
LSP                                    3                908 coarp 30.26.doc


            numbers of the respective Advocates of the parties to the
            Arbitral Tribunal. Communications to such email
            addresses shall constitute valid service of correspondence
            in connection with the arbitration;

     E)     All arbitral costs and fees of the Arbitral Tribunal shall be
            borne by the Petitioner only.

2.        Commercial Arbitration Petition is disposed of in above terms.



                                                  (S.M. MODAK, J.)


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.