Bombay High Court
SUDHA ANURSHETRUversusESSAR OIL LIMITED
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- MADHAV JAMDAR
Holding
The Commercial Execution Application was dismissed for non‑prosecution under Rule 329.
Summary
Sudha Anurshetru filed a Commercial Execution Application against Essar Oil Limited in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant. The matter was listed for dismissal under Rule 329 of the Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980. The Court noted the applicant's non‑appearance and consequently dismissed the application for non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar on 28 January 2026.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when an applicant fails to appear for a commercial execution application?
Legislation cited
- Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980 — s. Rule 329
Subjects
- commercial execution
- dismissal
- non‑prosecution
- Bombay High Court
- Rule 329
Judgment
47-COMEX-12-2017.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.12 OF 2017
Sudha Anurshetru …Applicant
Versus
Essar Oil Limited …Respondent
Digitally
signed by None for the Applicant.
SONALI
SONALI MILIND None for the Respondent.
MILIND PATIL
PATIL Date:
2026.01.29
09:57:05
+0530
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 28th JANUARY 2026
PC:-
1. The matter is listed for dismissal under Rule 329 of the
Bombay High Court (Original Side) Rules, 1980.
2. None appears for the Applicant.
3. Accordingly, the Commercial Execution Application is
dismissed for non-prosecution.
[MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]
Page 1
Sonali
Checking your session…