Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
147 judgments · newest first · showing 1–147
The petitioners, Pramod Vitthal Kamble and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking direction to the State of Maharashtra and related authorities to act on a representation dated 8 October 2025 concerning an increase in gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. The …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
The petitioners challenged an order of the Deputy Director of Education, Kolhapur Division, which rejected a proposal on the ground that the petitioner had not produced a minority status certificate. The petitioners relied on a prior judgment (Writ Petition No.11856 of 2024) that held an approved …
The petitioner, Subhash Harishing Shiledar, challenged the District Caste Scrutiny Committee’s order rejecting his claim that he belongs to the "Rajput Bhamta" caste, seeking a remand for fresh adjudication. He relied on a school record of his alleged paternal aunt showing the "Rajput Bhamta" caste, …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction to the State to decide an appeal they had filed on 20 February 2025 under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, challenging a municipal council order dated 21 January 2025. …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 18‑03‑2026, which mistakenly stated that they were entitled to revise their pension. They contended that the correct intention was to grant them benefits of an additional salary increment. The Court …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 18‑03‑2026, which mistakenly stated that they were entitled to revise their pension. They contended that the correct intention was to grant them benefits of an additional salary increment. The Court …
The petitioners, Raghunath Tanaji Dalvi and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking correction of a prior order dated 18 March 2026. They requested that specific wording in paragraph 3 be altered: the phrase “to get revise their pension” was to be changed to “to get …
The petitioners filed writ petitions seeking correction of a typographical error in the order dated 18‑03‑2026, which mistakenly stated that they were entitled to revise their pension. They contended that the correct intention was to grant them benefits of an additional salary increment. The Court …
Shivamma Yallappa Potenavaru filed a writ petition seeking to quash a government resolution that declared Anjali Yoginath Bajaramath as President of Maindargi Municipal Council following the 2025 municipal election. The petitioner argued the election was invalid, while the respondent argued that …
The petitioner, Kiran Tanaji Katte, obtained a sanad under Section 44(A) of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and consent from the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board to operate a stone crusher on his property in Satara. He also secured a licence under Section 71(3)(c) of the Maharashtra Minor …
The petitioner, Sambhaji Kallappa Patil, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction that Respondents 3 and 4 complete a re‑audit of Respondent No.5 under Section 81(6) of the Maharashtra Co‑operative Societies Act, 1961 within 30 days, as ordered on 15 October 2025 by the District Deputy …
The New Education Society filed a writ petition alleging that the Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities, Maharashtra, had not acted on a recommendation dated 15 November 2024 to include its employees in the "Sevarth Pranali" scheme, causing loss of monetary benefits. The petitioners had been …
The petitioners, who are Assistant Teachers employed by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur, filed writ petitions seeking an additional salary increment as prescribed in a Government Resolution dated 31 December 1989. They contended that their service records demonstrated eligibility for the increment. The …
Kashiling Majur Sahakari Sanstha Ltd. filed Writ Petition No. 1218 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Suryajeet P. Chavan, sought to withdraw the writ petition while …
The petitioners challenged the issuance of a show‑cause notice dated 27 March 2026 by the Tehsildar, Hatkanagale, alleging that it was not issued in accordance with the procedure prescribed under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. The High Court examined whether the notice complied …
The petitioner, Uday Shivaji Jagtap, filed Writ Petition No. 1911 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging actions of the District Collector, Solapur. Subsequently, the petitioner, through counsel Ms. Isha Patil, sought to withdraw the petition. The respondents, …
The petitioners, a group of private educational institutions, challenged two Government Resolutions dated 1 April 2026 and 2 April 2026 that disqualified them from receiving grant‑in‑aid on the ground of alleged non‑compliance with assessment norms. The State argued that the institutions could apply …
The appellant, a teacher appointed on a temporary basis, challenged his termination dated 26 November 2001, alleging the appointment was illegal. The School Tribunal held that he was appointed in the science stream to a post reserved for a Scheduled Caste candidate, whereas the vacancy created by a …
The petitioner, Bhimashankar Suryakant Irshetti, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to respondent No.3 to forward a proposal for granting a Shalarth ID to respondent No.4, and further to compel respondent No.4 to decide on the proposal. The Attorney General for the State submitted that …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
Datta Panchayatan and others filed a writ petition (No. 7323 of 2000) before the Bombay High Court against Maruti Malu Salunkhe and others. The petitioners sought relief, but the court found that they had not prosecuted the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition for …
Kolhapur Auto Works Pvt. Ltd and another filed a writ petition (No. 5313 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur, challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Jitendra N. Somaiya, while the respondents were represented by Mr. …
The petitioners, who are District/State Awardee Teachers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking the release of an additional increment and related arrears as per the Government Resolution dated 12 December 2000. The State of Maharashtra had later issued a Resolution on 4 September 2014 and …
The petitioners, senior medical professionals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking declaration that they are entitled to salary scales dating from 1986, 1996 and 2006, as well as payment of arrears and a non‑practicing allowance. They relied on a 2017 coordinate bench …
The applicants filed an interim application in a first appeal before the Bombay High Court, seeking relief despite a delay of 357 days in filing the appeal. The respondent, New India Assurance Company Limited, strongly opposed the application. The court examined whether the delay warranted dismissal …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
The petitioners alleged that land (Gat No. 49, 1.63 hectares) in Mouza Khandali was taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for construction of a percolation tank without any acquisition proceeding. They sought a directive for acquisition of the land and payment of compensation with interest …
The petitioners alleged that several land parcels in Mouza Shetphal, Solapur were taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for the construction of Percolation Tank No.11 without any formal acquisition. They sought a directive for the authorities to acquire the land and pay compensation with …
The petitioners alleged that land parcels totaling 2.93 hectares in Daingadewadi village were taken into possession by the Deputy Collector for the construction of a percolation tank without any acquisition proceeding. They sought a court direction to acquire the land and pay compensation with …
The petitioner, Sunil Suresh Hubale, was appointed as a teacher on 10 December 2024, but his proposal for approval was rejected by the Education Officer on 23 June 2025 relying on a communication from the Director of Education dated 28 May 2025. The petitioner challenged the rejection, arguing that …
The petitioners, Pandurang and others, filed a writ petition challenging a grievance against the State of Maharashtra and its education department. The petition sought relief concerning an order issued by the Zilla Parishad, Kolhapur. The respondents filed a revised order on 14 November 2025, issued …
The appellant, Atul Hiralal Vora, filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) challenging an order dated 26 August 2011 that granted the sixth respondent six weeks to produce a certificate issued by the Commissioner under the third proviso of Section 30(1) of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1923. The order …
The applicant, Maruti Rajaram Mohite, filed an appeal against his conviction before the Bombay High Court, Circuit Bench at Kolhapur. The appeal was filed 7 days later than the statutory period permitted for filing. An interim application was made seeking condonation of this delay. The court …
The petitioner, Suvarna Vishwas Kumbhar, challenged the Education Officer's order dated 22 July 2025 that rejected his individual approval proposal, alleging that the order was passed without granting him a hearing. The petitioner argued that, if given an opportunity, he and the school management …
Petitioner Uday Jagtap was appointed as a peon in a minority‑run school in August 2017. The school sought approval of the appointment from the Education Officer, who rejected it on 24 June 2022, relying on a Government Resolution dated 11 December 2020 that declared the post of non‑teaching staff …
Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition and requested liberty to institute a civil suit for appropriate reliefs. The Court considered the …
Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the writ petition and requested liberty to institute a civil suit for appropriate reliefs. The Court …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 28‑day delay in filing a Family Court appeal. The respondents opposed the application, arguing that the delay was unacceptable. The court examined the reasons for the delay and, despite the opposition, decided to allow the …
The petitioner, Mueen, filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the order dated 17 January 2025 of the Deputy Inspector General of Prisons, Pune, which rejected his application for furlough leave. The petitioner’s counsel argued that the order was based on the Maharashtra Prisons …
The dispute concerned the ad‑hoc fee for a postgraduate medical course for the 2024‑25 academic year at Prakash Shikshan Mandal. The institution claimed it could set the fee, while the student petitioners and the Fee Regulating Authority (FRA) argued that the fee must be determined by the FRA under …
The petitioners, teachers, filed writ petitions seeking direction to the Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of their respective Zilla Parishads to decide pending representations concerning a government scheme that allows husband and wife teachers to be posted at the same station or within 30 km. They …
The petitioner, Deepak Lakshman Supugade, filed an interim application seeking restoration of Writ Petition (Stamp) No.15646 of 2024, which had been dismissed for non‑prosecution by orders dated 16 August 2024 and 2 September 2024. The court examined whether a dismissed petition could be revived …
The petitioners, teachers, filed writ petitions seeking direction to the Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) of their respective Zilla Parishads to decide pending representations concerning a government scheme that allows husband and wife teachers to be posted at the same station or within 30 km. They …
The Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Bench, listed a large number of pending writ petitions and criminal appeals under the caption “Spare Copies Not Supplied”. The court directed the learned advocate for the petitioner/appellant/applicant to furnish spare copies of the pleadings within ten days to the …
The petitioner, Nandkumar Infrastructure LLP, filed a writ petition seeking correction of the minutes of an order dated 04.03.2026, as the appearance of counsel for Respondents Nos.2 and 3 was omitted. Respondents Nos.2 and 3 submitted a praecipe on 07.03.2026 requesting that the court record the …
Petitioners Prakash Shikshan Mandal and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Kolhapur Circuit Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. Subsequently, the petitioners, through their counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Divisional Commissioner of Pune to decide a complaint filed under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. A Division Bench ordered the Commissioner to decide the complaint, but the petitioners alleged …
The petitioners, Manisha Abasaheb Gite and others, filed a writ petition seeking a court direction to the Education Officer (Secondary) of Zilla Parishad, Solapur, to decide a proposal dated 9 December 2024 that had remained pending. The petition was limited to obtaining an expeditious decision …
The petitioner, Arif Amajadkhan Pathan, challenged a notice terminating his weighman licence upon reaching the age of 58 under the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) bye‑laws. He argued that the age restriction is inapplicable to him because he is covered by the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal …
The petitioner, a 32‑year‑old typist and self‑described social worker, filed a public interest litigation seeking a direction to the State of Maharashtra to act against persons occupying Galas without authorization and allegedly in arrears of rent, relying on information obtained under the Right to …
Sambhaji Aaba Karande filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the legality of an order dated 7 December 2022 issued by the Deputy Collector (Land Acquisition) No.6, Kolhapur. Both parties consented to dispose of the petition, and the High Court quashed the impugned order and remanded the …
The petitioner, Abhimanyu Rutuja Rajesh Rathye, filed a writ petition seeking relief. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner obtained individual approval for the relief sought, rendering the petition infructuous. Counsel for the petitioner moved that the petition be withdrawn on this …
The dispute concerned the determination of ad‑hoc fees for a postgraduate medical course for the 2024‑25 academic year at Prakash Shikshan Mandal. The institute claimed it could set the fees, while the students and the Fee Regulating Authority (FRA) argued that the FRA alone had the authority to fix …
The petitioner challenged a 15 December 2021 order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class granting house‑rent and maintenance to his wife and daughter under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and a subsequent appellate confirmation. He argued that the affidavit required by the …
The petitioner, Sopan Ramchandra Kajale, challenged a 15 December 2021 order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Chandwad, which directed payment of house rent and maintenance to his wife and daughter under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and a subsequent order …
The petitioners, Arjun Vitthal and partners of Indiana Fabricators, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. Respondent No.2, represented by counsel, submitted that the petition had become infructuous following an order dated 1 June 2026 issued …
The petitioners, original accused Nos. 2, 3 and 4, filed an application under Section 311 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to recall witnesses PW‑1 and PW‑2 for further cross‑examination, alleging that a letter dated 22 September 2011 was not part of the charge‑sheet. The State and …
The applicant, Yugandhar Meka, filed a criminal application on 3 April 2025 challenging a Metropolitan Magistrate order dated 4 January 2022. The respondents argued that the application was filed after a delay of over three years and that the proper remedy was a revision, not a criminal application. …
The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Thane, issued an order under Section 56(1)(A)(B) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 directing the externment of the petitioner, Liyakat Sharafat Qureshi. The petitioner challenged this order by filing a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After …
The petitioner, a husband, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution seeking enforcement of a March 5, 2026 order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class that allowed him to peacefully enter the marital flat. He had also filed an application (Exhibit‑17) with the police …
The petitioner, a single mother of a minor daughter with ADHD, filed a writ petition seeking the expeditious disposal of Appeal No. 106 of 2026 and an application under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The petition argued that the appeal was scheduled for hearing on 28 July 2026 and …
The petitioner failed to appear before the High Court. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of want of prosecution. No further arguments or evidence were presented. The dismissal was ordered by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar.
The petitioner, Anil Kumar Kalika Prasad Shivhare, challenged the order dated 24 September 2024 of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, which rejected his application to recall the witness of the respondent, Mahima @ Pinki Anilkumar Shivhare, for cross‑examination. The petitioner claimed …
Petitioner Ateeque Ahmad Khan filed a writ petition challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. He moved the court to withdraw the petition, contending that an alternative remedy exists under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951. The court considered whether the availability of that …
The petitioners challenged the legality of an order dated 6 October 2023 passed by a Metropolitan Magistrate and a subsequent order dated 30 August 2024 passed by an Additional Sessions Judge, contending that the courts failed to consider the substantial income and loan transactions of Respondent …
The petitioners had filed several writ petitions in the High Court of Bombay challenging various orders. Subsequently, they applied for leave to withdraw all the petitions. The Court, after considering the application, granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petitions were dismissed as …
The petitioner, Sonali, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging matters arising from consent terms entered into before the Family Court, Jaipur. The petitioner, through counsel Ayush Pasbola, sought to withdraw the writ petition, stating that the parties had reached an agreement. …
Petitioner Arjun Vitthal filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against respondents. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Vedang Shirawale, later instructed the court to withdraw the petition. The court considered the request and, noting that the petitioner was free to …
The petitioner, Nilesh Jitendra Phadtare, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution challenging Externment Order No.36 of 2025 and its confirmation on 6 February 2026, which barred him from the Pimpri‑Chinchwad area for 24 months. He argued that the show‑cause notices …
The applicant, Anurag Nathulal Verma, filed an affidavit withdrawing certain allegations made in an earlier interim application (No. 1575 of 2026) and sought to withdraw that interim application altogether. The respondent, Monika Anurag Verma & Anr., were served with the withdrawal. The learned …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The petitioners, Shree Swami Samarth Construction, sought to recall the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination in six cheque‑bounce cases filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Earlier applications to set aside the "No Cross Order" had been allowed in 2021, …
The Bombay High Court considered six writ petitions filed by Shree Swami Samarth Construction seeking to set aside orders that denied recall of the complainant and other witnesses for cross‑examination under Section 311 of the CrPC. The complaints, filed in 2016 under Section 138 of the Negotiable …
The applicant, Arjun Hasan Ahmad Majhumdar, filed a criminal application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking to quash the order of the Special Judge, POCSO Court, Dindoshi, which had rejected his solvency surety. The applicant had been granted bail by a Single …
The petitioners, who are in‑laws of Respondent No.2, challenged the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate's order rejecting their applications for discharge in a criminal case (CC No.1283/PW/2020). The FIR alleged only that the in‑laws urged the respondent to seek divorce and contained no other …
In a writ petition filed by Majeeda Mauzam Kazi, the High Court ordered that the Court Receiver take actual physical possession of the disputed property. The Court Receiver, represented by Mr. Deepak Bhalerao, submitted a site report confirming possession. The petitioner’s counsel agreed to deposit …
Meera Ravi Punjabi and Sonia Rajesh Punjabi filed writ petitions challenging the dismissal of their applications under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which sought interim compensation of 20% of the cheque amounts. The Metropolitan Magistrate had dismissed the applications, but the …
Tata Capital Limited (formerly Tata Motors Finances Limited) filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court against Ranvijay Kumar Singh and others. The petitioner, through counsel, sought to withdraw the petition. The court entertained the request and permitted the withdrawal. …
A criminal writ petition (No. 2302 of 2026) was filed in the High Court of Bombay by Sonali Milind and others against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Niranjan Mundargi and a team of counsel from Trilegal. The petitioners sought to withdraw the writ …
The applicants, Utsarg Shambhunarayan Singh and others, filed a criminal revision application against Anchal Utsarg Singh and another respondent. During the hearing, both parties informed the court that they had settled the dispute. The applicants' counsel, Dr. Samarth Shrikant Karmarkar, requested …
The petitioners filed a writ under Article 227 challenging the Additional Sessions Judge's order rejecting their application for condonation of delay in filing a revision against a 2021 magistrate order. They argued that the delay of about 100 days was caused by the advanced age (94 years) of one …
The petitioner, Avinash Rajaram Kalokhe, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 10 March 2025 issued by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Khed, which authorized the issuance of process against him. The petitioner alleged that the respondent altered …
Deepak Bhargava filed Criminal Revision Application No.346 of 2017, which was dismissed by the learned Single Judge on 19 January 2024 for non‑prosecution. He subsequently filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 482‑day delay in filing the revision and restoration of the dismissed …
The petitioner, Sonali, filed a writ petition (No.1300 of 2024) in the Bombay High Court against respondents Sushma R. Adelkar and an unnamed second respondent. The petition was filed in the civil appellate jurisdiction and was signed digitally by the petitioner. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. …
The petitioners filed an urgent praecipe stating that the necessary papers and proceedings from the Principal Seat at Bombay had not been received, preventing them from filing an application to bring in the legal heirs of a respondent. The Court examined the request and directed the Registry to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Tukaram Rambhau Shinde under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with offences under Sections 3(5) and 303(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The prosecution alleged that Shinde was …
The applicants, Jaideep Salil Ghoshal and another, were arrested and filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant’s counsel, Mr. Akshay Bankapur, later informed the court that the bail application had become infructuous and sought its withdrawal. The …
The High Court of Bombay, presided over by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar, issued a common order on 27 February 2026 due to a shortage of time. The order adjourns matters listed under Senior Numbers 33 to 165 of the Daily Main Board, except for numbers 39, 73, 81, 107, and 144, to specified later dates in …
The High Court of Bombay, presided over by Justice Madhav J. Jamdar, issued a common order on 27 February 2026 due to a shortage of time. The order adjourns matters listed under Senior Numbers 33 to 165 of the Daily Main Board, except for numbers 39, 73, 81, 107, and 144, to specified later dates in …
The applicant, Dattatray Kisan Gaikwad, filed an anticipatory bail application directly in the Bombay High Court without first approaching the Sessions Court. The counsel for the applicant sought to withdraw the application, stating that a filing would be made before the Sessions Court instead. The …
The applicant, Shubham Vikas Rajpure, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with a case alleging attempted murder and assault (IPC Sections 307, 504, 506 read with Section 34). The FIR was lodged five days after the incident and did not initially name the applicant; …
The State of Maharashtra filed an FIR (C.R. No.915 of 2025) alleging that the applicants, members of the Kokane family, assaulted the informant and his relatives with iron rods, sticks, and chilli powder during a land dispute, causing injuries including a fracture. The applicants filed a cross‑FIR …
The applicant, Pritam Dhanrajji Samdadiya, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No.185 of 2024 alleging offences under IPC Sections 406, 419 and 420. The prosecution alleged that the applicant, an Area Manager of Jeevansh Fincom Private Limited, induced a …
The parties to a real‑estate dispute involving Runwal Construction Private Limited and the Nadkarni respondents entered into a Consent Terms settlement, which was presented before the Bombay High Court. The Consent Terms provided for the execution of a sale agreement for Flat No. 2102, payment of …
The petitioner, Arjun Vitthal, filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders issued under the Rent Control Act against him. During the hearing, the petitioner and Respondent No.3, Sangeetha Nirwani Chalwadi, presented a mutually agreed "Terms of Settlement/Consent Terms" and affirmed that the …
The applicant, Arjun (Gunvant Chandrakant Dabhade), filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The respondent's counsel, Ms. G. P. Mulekar, contended that the application omitted a material antecedent. The applicant's counsel, Mr. Anandmaya …
The Bombay High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, relating to alleged land‑grabbing and organised crime offences under Sections 111, 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The First …
The High Court considered a batch of anticipatory bail applications filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with FIR No.149 of 2025 alleging land‑grabbing and organised crime under Sections 111, 318(4) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The …
The petitioner filed an interim application seeking recall of the Court's order dated 11 December 2025 which had dismissed Criminal Application No.415 of 2025 for non‑prosecution. The Court examined whether the interim application was maintainable and whether the earlier dismissal could be set …
The applicant, XYZ, filed an anticipatory bail application under the Criminal Procedure Code. The applicant later instructed counsel, Mr. Abhijit Sarwate, to withdraw the application. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, was represented by Ms. G.P. Mulekar. The Court considered whether a party …
The applicant, Ashok Nivrutti Udage, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. The applicant's counsel did not appear before the court. The respondent's counsel, Ms. R.V. Newton, informed the court that the applicant had already been arrested. The court noted that an …
The petitioners, Hemant Suresh Kadam and Suresh Ganpat Kadam, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a maintenance order directing Rs 30,000 per month for their children and Rs 12,000 for rent, originally ordered by a Judicial Magistrate and affirmed by an Additional Sessions Judge. The …
The applicant, a divorced wife, filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order that denied her maintenance under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, on the ground that she was no longer a wife after a triple talaq divorce. The High Court examined the Explanation (b) …
The applicants, Jeewan Singh Mehra and Rekha Mehra, filed revision applications (Nos. 580 and 618 of 2024) against Jyoti Kumari and the State of Maharashtra in the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, the parties reached a settlement of their disputes. Both sides, through their counsel, …
The petitioner, Anirudha Upadhyay, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging a Family Court order dated 25 April 2025 that dismissed his wife's application for direction to pay the EMI on a flat and partially allowed her maintenance application by ordering interim maintenance of Rs 5,000 …
The applicant, Seema Ambadas Hundekar, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 53‑day delay in filing a civil revision application. The High Court had previously issued notice to the respondent, Mehmood Mehendi Khan, on 30 September 2024, which was served, but the respondent failed to …
The applicant, Ravindra Shankar Mohire, filed three civil revision applications challenging the dismissal of his delay‑condonation applications and the effect of consent terms entered in appeals of inter‑pleader suits. He argued that the consent terms were executed only between the original …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear in both the morning and afternoon sessions. As a result, the court kept the matter pending and subsequently dismissed the petition for want of prosecution. No substantive arguments or evidence were …
The applicant, Vishal Balasaheb Shivale, filed an anticipatory bail application and sought correction of a clerical error in the order dated 28 January 2026, where the police station was incorrectly named as “MIDC Police Station, District- Ahilyanagar.” Counsel for the applicant argued that the …
The petitioner, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 challenging orders of the Small Causes Court that directed common recording of evidence in two related suits (L.D. Suit No. 52 of 2008 and L.E.&C. Suit No. 142 of 2016) and allegedly shifted the burden of proof onto the …
The applicant, Bibhushan Dilipkumar Parija, a senior manager at HDFC Bank, was charged under Section 306 IPC for abetment of suicide after his subordinate, Jitendra Sharma, allegedly was humiliated and physically assaulted by him and subsequently jumped onto a train. The trial court rejected the …
The applicant, Subodh Sadanand Ghag, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with a FIR (CR No.85 of 2025) alleging offences under IPC Sections 420, 467, 468 and 471 relating to a property dispute with his ex‑wife, the first …
The applicants, Nitten Laxmanrao Chavan and Sarfraj Ahmed Ulfatali Shaikh, filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for offences under Sections 316(4) and 61(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Sections …
The applicants filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an assault on the first informant. The …
The applicants filed anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking pre‑arrest bail for alleged offences under Sections 115(2), 118(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, arising from an assault on the first informant. The …
Atul Govind Patil filed a writ petition which was dismissed by the Registrar (Judicial‑I) on 23 September 2025 for failure to remove office objections, without any notice to the respondent. The applicant filed an interim application seeking restoration of the petition, arguing that the dismissal at …
The Bombay High Court examined an anticipatory bail application filed by Shreeyash Manik Jagtap in connection with C.R. No.178 of 2025, where all accused had surrendered. Earlier, the court had declined pre‑arrest bail, citing the seriousness of the offence, but noted concerns about police conduct …
The Bombay High Court considered several criminal revision applications filed by Husna Atikur Rehman Shaikh and related applicants against the State of Maharashtra. The applicants failed to appear for the scheduled hearings, despite the court granting an additional opportunity on 23 January 2026. …
Sandip Somnath Hiray filed an anticipatory bail application before the Bombay High Court. The State of Maharashtra, through its learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, contended that the applicant had a prior antecedent which was not disclosed in the application. The applicant's counsel sought to …
The applicant, Gajanan Chandrakant Madbhave, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, alleging that he sold a flat for Rs.38,81,000 despite the flat being mortgaged with an outstanding loan of about Rs.34,17,000. The prosecution …
The Bombay High Court examined an anticipatory bail application filed by Shreeyash Manik Jagtap in connection with C.R. No.178 of 2025, where all accused had surrendered. Earlier, the court had declined pre‑arrest bail, citing the seriousness of the offence, but noted concerns about police conduct …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking recall of the High Court's order dated 6 January 2026 that dismissed Writ Petition No.12163 of 2025 for non‑prosecution. The respondent opposed the application, but the Court, after considering the reasons advanced, allowed the interim application. …
The Bombay High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, by Rohan Chintamani Shinde, who was charged under Sections 69, 71 and 316 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for alleged false promise of marriage, repeated …
The applicant filed an anticipatory bail application, but the order dated 17 January 2026 incorrectly recorded his name as “Dilip Sopan Kolate” instead of “Dilip Sopan Kalate”. The applicant, through counsel, sought a correction of this clerical mistake. The court examined whether a judicial order …
The High Court, acting on its earlier order of 8 September 2025, had permitted Sneha Bhavesh Shetty (Respondent No.1) to withdraw Rs 6,60,000 with interest that had been deposited by the original petitioner, Bhavesh Mahabala Shetty. An interim application was filed seeking that the withdrawal be …
The petitioner, Ms. Manisha B. Pandya, filed an interim application seeking recall of a dismissal order dated 17 November 2025, which had dismissed her writ petition for want of prosecution. She alleged that she and her counsel were unaware of the sudden notification of the hearing date and …
The husband and wife filed reciprocal writ petitions challenging a maintenance order that increased the husband's liability to Rs.40,000 per month for the wife and Rs.20,000 for their son. The husband claimed his income was limited to a salary of Rs.1,14,950, modest investment returns and a small …
The applicant, Mr. Anil Solomon Singh, filed an anticipatory bail application before the High Court of Bombay. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel expressed that the Court was not inclined to grant the bail. Consequently, the applicant sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail application. …
The petitioner, Ashraf Firoz Shaikh, challenged the validity of two orders—one dated 30 July 2024 directing him to pay interim compensation of Rs.13,000 per month for 52 months, and another dated 30 January 2025 confirming the same—issued by the Small Causes Court and the Trial Court. He alleged …
The applicants were accused of assaulting the informant and his family during a land dispute, with charges under several sections of the Indian Penal Code including assault, criminal intimidation and rioting. The prosecution filed a charge‑sheet on 15 February 2025, and the applicants sought …
The Bombay High Court heard a writ petition filed by Bank of Baroda (Old Dena Bank) challenging an order of the Small Causes Court that dismissed a Marji application seeking condonation of an 83‑day delay. The petitioners argued the order was illegal, while the respondents consented to its quashal …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking recall and setting aside of the order dated 11 November 2025, which had dismissed Criminal Writ Petition No.2920 of 2024 on the ground of non‑prosecution. The court examined the grounds raised in the interim application and found merit in the relief …
The trial court convicted the accused under IPC sections 465, 467, 468, 471 read with 114 for forging a fixed‑deposit receipt and withdrawing Rs 50,000. The conviction was based on testimony of witnesses and a handwriting expert who identified forged signatures but did not link them to the accused. …
Arjun, a BEST bus driver, was convicted under Section 304A IPC for the death of a cyclist's brother and sentenced to six months' rigorous imprisonment. He appealed, arguing that the sole eyewitness, PW‑2, was not identified through a test identification parade and that the evidence did not prove he …
The applicant, Sonali, filed a criminal revision application before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the respondents. The applicant's counsel submitted that the underlying dispute between the parties had been settled and therefore requested the withdrawal of the revision application. The …
The applicant, Bhagwat Vishwanath Chaudhari, sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the CrPC in connection with FIR No. 0478/2024 alleging offences of forgery, cheating and criminal conspiracy under various sections of the IPC. The Single Judge had earlier granted interim bail subject to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC filed by Nilesh Sunil Burade, who was implicated in a FIR alleging offences including cheating, criminal breach of trust, assault, extortion, caste-based harassment, money‑lending violations and offences under …
The State of Maharashtra filed an FIR alleging that the applicants forged a No‑Objection Certificate (NOC) and cheated a buyer by selling the same flat twice. The applicants contended that the NOC was genuine, citing the society secretary’s letter, and argued that the dispute was essentially civil, …
The applicant Arjun sought anticipatory bail in connection with offences under the Indian Forests Act, 1927 for allegedly transporting illegal timber. The Single Judge initially granted interim protection, allowing amendment of the prayer to correct the C.R. number and directing the investigating …
The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the CrPC for offences under Sections 420 and 406 of the IPC arising from a fraud case (CR No.626/2024). The prosecution argued the offence was serious, but noted that a charge‑sheet had already been filed and the …
The High Court of Bombay heard Anticipatory Bail Application No.2951 of 2024 filed by Dhirajkumar Surendra Sethiya, accused of offences under sections 419, 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code for allegedly forging a document of an informant’s identity. The applicant argued …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging a Small Causes Court order that stayed an eviction decree and required the petitioners to pay Rs.30,000 per month as interim compensation. Both parties consented to modify the interim compensation amount to …
Mehboob Abdul Hamid Shaikhji filed a writ petition (No.12437 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court against the deceased Parvati Gangaram Mosamkar and Anjiali Ganpat Paste. The petitioner sought relief but the court noted that the address of respondent No.1.A was not on record, making service of notice …
