Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

Hindustan Unilever LimitedversusSHAMSUDHEEN K S trading as A Plus Detergents

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court ordered the removal of the suit from the board as it had already been disposed.

Summary

The matter is Commercial IP Suit No. 125 of 2026 filed by Hindustan Unilever Limited against Shamsudheen K S trading as A Plus Detergents. Plaintiff’s counsel appeared before the court and informed that the suit had already been disposed of on 9 March 2026. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented on the day of hearing. The court, upon receiving this information, directed that the case be removed from the board. No further orders on the merits of the dispute were recorded.

Subjects

  • procedural
  • court administration
  • case removal

Judgment

                                                      74 COMIP-125-2026.doc


             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                  ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
                       IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION

                   COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 125 OF 2026

Hindustan Unilever Limited                               ...Plainti$
          Versus
Shamsudheen K S trading as A Plus Detergents             ...Defendant

                              ——————
Ms. Niyati Davawala, Mr. Anil Shete, Ms. Nidhi Rao, Ms. Chandrika Devda
i/b Davawala and Co. for the Plainti .
                              ——————

                             CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
                             DATE     : MARCH 26, 2026


P. C. :

1.        Mentioned out of turn.

2.        Learned counsel appearing for Plainti$ submits that the suit has

already been disposed of on 9th March, 2026.

3.        Hence, remove from Board.




                                        [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]




Sairaj                              1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.