Bombay High Court
BHARAT NANUBHAI SHIROYAversusPINAL BHARAT SHIROYA
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE
Holding
The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Bharat Nanubhai Shiroya, filed Contempt Petition No.163 of 2021 in the High Court of Bombay. On the scheduled date of 9 January 2026, no counsel or party appeared on behalf of the petitioner. Subsequent adjournments also saw the petitioner’s continued non‑appearance, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the petition. The Court examined whether the petition could proceed in the absence of the petitioner. Finding that the petitioner had not taken steps to prosecute the petition, the Court dismissed it for want of prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by Justice Dr. Neela Gokhale.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate course of action when a petitioner fails to appear for a contempt petition?
Subjects
- contempt petition
- want of prosecution
- non‑appearance
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- petition dismissed
Judgment
Shivgan 67-CP-163-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CONTEMPT PETITION NO.163 OF 2021
Bharat Nanubhai Shiroya …Petitioner
Versus
Pinal Bharat Shiroya …Respondent
None for the petitioner.
CORAM DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.
DATED: 6th FEBRUARY 2026
PC:-
1. On 9th January 2026, when the matter was called out,
none appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.
2. Even today, when the matter is called out, none appears
on behalf of the Petitioner.
3. It appears that the Petitioner is not interested in
pursuing the Petition.
4. The Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J)
Digitally
signed by
SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN Date:
2026.02.07
15:19:54
+0530
Page 1 of 1
th
6 February 2026
Checking your session…