Bombay High Court

Shweta Pravin ParmarversusPune Metropolitan Region Development Authority

Decided: 28 April 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off
Bench: RAVINDRA V GHUGE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn because the grievance has been redressed.

Summary

The petitioner, Shweta Pravin Parmar, filed a contempt petition (No. 265 of 2026) in the High Court of Bombay, which was at the pre‑notice stage. The petitioner’s counsel moved on 27 April 2026 to withdraw the petition, stating that the grievance had been redressed. The respondents, represented by the Corporation, produced an order dated 23 April 2026, which they claimed addressed the petitioner’s grievance. The Court examined the withdrawal request and the respondents’ order. Finding that the petitioner’s grievance was indeed satisfied, the Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn on the parties’ instructions.

Issues considered

Whether a contempt petition at the pre‑notice stage may be withdrawn by the petitioner
Whether the respondents' order sufficiently redressed the petitioner’s grievance

Subjects

contempt
withdrawal
pre‑notice
writ petition
High Court
petition disposal

Judgment

                                                                                   901-CP-265-2026.odt



                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
 PURTI                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
 PRASAD
 PARAB
Digitally signed by
PURTI PRASAD
PARAB
Date: 2026.04.29
                                    CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 265 OF 2026
17:38:26 +0530

                                                  IN
                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 2789 OF 2026

                      Shweta Pravin Parmar                            … Petitioner
                           Versus
                      Pune Metropolitan Region Development
                      Authority and Ors.                              … Respondents
                                                       ****
                      Mr. Harjot Singh Alang for the Petitioner.
                      Mr. Rohit Sakhadeo for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
                                                       ****
                                          CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND
                                                  HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.

                                          DATE        : 28th APRIL, 2026
                      P.C. :

                      1.            This Petition is at a pre-notice stage.


                      2.            The learned Advocate for the Petitioner has circulated this

                      Petition vide Motion dated 27th April, 2026 seeking leave to withdraw

                      the Petition as the grievance is redressed. The said praecipe is marked as

                      “X” for identification.



                      3.            The learned Advocate for the Corporation has tendered a

                      copy of an order dated 23rd April, 2026 ( 9 pages). According to him this

                      takes care of the grievance of the Petitioner. The said order is marked as

                      “Y” for identification.


                      Purti Parab                               1
                                                        901-CP-265-2026.odt



4.            In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions.



(HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, J.)                (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)




Purti Parab                          2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…