Bombay High Court
SALIM KHAN AKBAR KHAN PATHAN (MULLA)versusGAFFAR KHAN KALANDAR KHAN PATHAN AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SHAILESH P BRAHME
Holding
A civil revision is not maintainable where an appeal is the permissible remedy.
Summary
Salim Khan Akbar Khan Pathan (Mulla) filed a civil revision challenging a decree of possession that had been passed by the trial court and affirmed by the lower appellate court. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant at the hearing. The court examined whether a civil revision is an appropriate remedy when an appeal is available under law. It held that the revision was not tenable because the remedy of appeal is permissible. Consequently, the civil revision application was dismissed.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil revision is maintainable when an appeal is the appropriate remedy under the Civil Procedure Code
Subjects
- Civil Procedure Code
- Revision
- Appeal
- Decree of Possession
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:11950
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH
AT AURANGABAD
44 CRA NO. 114 OF 2021
SALIM KHAN AKBAR KHAN PATHAN (MULLA)
VERSUS
GAFFAR KHAN KALANDAR KHAN PATHAN AND ANOTHER
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Afzal Husain M. Vakil – Absent.
...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 18.03.2026
PER COURT :-
1. None appears for the applicant in both the sessions.
2. Civil revision application is emanating from the decree of
possession passed by the Trial Court which was confirmed by
Lower Appellate Court. Civil revision application is not tenable
as remedy of appeal is permissible in law.
3. Civil revision application is dismissed
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
...
vmk/-
Checking your session…