Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

M/S. R. J. GUEST WORLD AND ANRversusM/S. PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS PRIVATE LIMITED

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The revision application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

M/s. R.J. Guest World & Anr. filed a civil revision application (No. 206 of 2022) before the High Court of Bombay. The applicants failed to appear at the first hearing on 16 January 2026, and the matter was listed for dismissal. On the subsequent date, 23 January 2026, the applicants again did not appear, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the application. The Court observed that the revision application had been abandoned and therefore dismissed it for want of prosecution. The dismissal was entered without any further hearing.

Issues considered

  • Whether the civil revision application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicants' failure to appear?

Subjects

  • Civil Procedure Code
  • Revision
  • Dismissal
  • Want of prosecution

Judgment

                        k                                 1/1                      3 cra 206.22 as.doc




                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                         CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.206 OF 2022

                        M/s. R.J. Guest World & Anr.                                  ....Applicants
                             V/S
                        M/s. Pepsico India Holdings Private Limited                   ....Respondent
                                                    _________

                        None for the Applicants.
                                                          __________


                                                    CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                    DATE : 23 JANUARY 2026.
                        P.C.:

                        1.       On 16 January 2026, following order was passed:

                                 “1.    None appears for the Applicants. List the Revision Application
                                 under caption ‘for dismissal’ on 23 January 2026.”


                        2.       Today again none has appeared on behalf of the Applicants. It
                        appears that the Applicants have lost interest in prosecuting the
                        Application.


                        3.       The Civil Revision Application is accordingly dismissed for want
                        of prosecution.


                                                                (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
           Digitally
           signed by
           SUDARSHAN
SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM
RAJALINGAM KATKAM
KATKAM     Date:
           2026.01.27
           16:19:40
           +0530




                        katkam                                   Page No. 1 of 1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.