Bombay High Court
M/S. FAME BUILDERS, THR. PROPRIETOR MR. LALIT RAMCHANDRA SETPALversusPARMAR CONSTRUCTIONS THR. PROPRIETOR MR. HEMANT PARMAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SANDEEP V MARNE
Holding
The revision application was dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
M/s. Fame Builders filed a civil revision application against Parmar Constructions. The applicant failed to appear before the court on the scheduled date of 16 January 2026. The court again noted the applicant's non-appearance on 23 January 2026. It was observed that the applicant had lost interest in prosecuting the application. Consequently, the court dismissed the revision application for want of prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil revision application can be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- revision
- non-appearance
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
Judgment
k 1/1 4 cra 386.22 as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.386 OF 2022
M/s. Fame Builders ....Applicant
V/S
Parmar Constructions ....Respondent
_________
None for the Applicant.
__________
CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 23 JANUARY 2026.
P.C.:
1. On 16 January 2026, following order was passed:
“1. None appears for the Applicant. List the Revision Application under
caption ‘for dismissal’ on 23 January 2026.”
2. Today again none has appeared on behalf of the Applicant. It
appears that the Applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the
Application.
3. The Civil Revision Application is accordingly dismissed for want
of prosecution.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.)
Digitally
signed by
SUDARSHAN
SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM
RAJALINGAM KATKAM
KATKAM Date:
2026.01.27
16:19:30
+0530
katkam Page No. 1 of 1
Checking your session…