Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

UJJWAL SAMPAT CHORDIAversusMASTER ARIHANT PRAMOD TALERA THR. SMT. VASUMATI. P. TALERA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the revision applications and disposed of the matter.

Summary

The applicant, Ujjwal Sampat Chordia, filed a civil revision seeking relief against the respondents. The applicant's counsel requested permission to withdraw the revision applications while preserving the right to pursue other appropriate remedies. The High Court, after considering the request, allowed the withdrawal of the revision applications and ordered the matter disposed. The court clarified that the applicant remains eligible to invoke the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 for any future remedies. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed as the applications were withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • What is the court's discretion to allow withdrawal of a civil revision application?
  • Does the applicant retain the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963 after withdrawal?

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • revision
  • withdrawal
  • Limitation Act
  • Section 14
  • Civil appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                         Renuka                                            904-CRA-53-2021


                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                             CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
                                     CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2021
                         Ujjwal Sampat Chordia                                  ...Applicant

                                            V/s.

                         Arihant Pramod Talera & Ors.                         ...Respondent
                                                     ________________
                         Mr. Anshul Anjarlekar (through V.C) i/b Mr. Raval Shah for Applicant.

                         Mr. Tejas D. Deshmukh with Mr. Onkar Somvanshi for Respondent No. 1.

                         Mr. Amit Singh with Ms. Ashlesha Suryawanshi i/b Mr. Mithun Khaire for
                         Respondent No. 2
                                                     ________________
                                                        CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
                                                        DATED: 20 FEBRUARY 2026.


                         P.C.:


                         1)          The learned counsel appearing for the Applicant, on
                         instructions, seeks leave of the court to withdraw the revision
                         applications with liberty to adopt appropriate remedies in respect of the
                         impugned orders.

                         2)          Reserving the liberty so prayed for, the application is
                         permitted to be withdrawn and disposed of.


                         3)          It is clari@ed that in respect of remedies to be exercised by
                         the applicants, they would be entitled to bene@t under Section 14 of the
                         The Limitation Act,1963.
                                                                           [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
          Digitally signed
          by MEGHA
MEGHA     SHREEDHAR
SHREEDHAR PARAB
PARAB     Date:
          2026.02.21                                     Page No.1 of 1
          16:54:19 +0530
                                                        20 February 2026


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.