Bombay High Court
M/S SAMARTHA PRISHA PROP.THR. PARTHNER SHRIKANT BHASKARRAO SURYAVANSHIversusASHUTOSH SADANAND KARMARKAR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- PRAFULLA S KHUBALKAR
Holding
The civil revision application is disposed of in view of the consent terms.
Summary
M/s Samartha Prisha Properties filed a civil revision application challenging a civil suit (RCS No. 42 of 2023). Both parties later reached a settlement and executed consent terms, which were presented to the court. The counsel for both sides requested that the revision application be disposed of on the basis of the compromise. The court examined the consent terms (Document X) and treated the undertakings therein as submissions to the court. Accordingly, the court disposed of the civil revision application in view of the consent terms, effectively ending the proceedings.
Issues considered
- Whether the civil revision application can be disposed of on the basis of a compromise and consent terms between the parties.
Subjects
- civil revision
- compromise
- consent terms
- settlement
- appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
Digitally
signed by
ANANT
ANANT KRISHNA
KRISHNA NAIK
NAIK Date:
2026.08.04
12:13:40
+0530
902.CRA.631.2024.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 631 OF 2024
M/s Samartha Prisha Properties
Through authorized partners
Mr. Shrikant Bhaskarrao Suryavanshi ....Applicant
V/S
Ashutosh Sadanand Karmarkar & Ors ....Respondents
Mr. Pavan Patil a/w. Mr. N. Jagtap. Mr. Shubham Sharaff, Mr. Parth
Malusare, Mr. Soham Badole for the Applicant
Mr. Prafulla Paranjape for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3
Mr. Shivram A. Gawade i/b. Mr. Deepak P. More for the Respondent
Nos. 4 & 5
CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.
DATE : 31st JULY, 2026.
P.C. :-
1. Learned Counsel for the Applicants as well as learned Counsel
for the Respondent No. 1 to 5 states that the parties have amicably
resolved the controversy. It is submitted that the entire controversy
pending in the Civil Suit bearing RCS No. 42 of 2023 is settled in terms
of consent terms, which are signed by the Applicant herein (Original
Defendant No. 1) and the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 (Original Plaintiffs),
1
902.CRA.631.2024.doc
who have been identified by their lawyers.
2. Learned Counsel for the Applicants and the Respondents
submits that the instant Civil Revision Application may be disposed of
in terms of compromise. The original documents of consent terms is
placed on record, which is marked as “Document X” for the purpose of
identification.
3. It is also stated that the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 are personally
present today and representative of the Applicant No. 1 is also present
in the Court.
4. The consent terms are taken on record and accordingly the
undertakings mentioned in the consent terms be treated as
undertakings submitted to the Court.
5. The Civil Revision Application is accordingly disposed of in
view of ‘Consent Terms’.
(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.)
2
Checking your session…