Bombay High Court
GANESHA MOHANversusRAGINI MOHAN
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- SANDEEP V MARNE
Holding
The Court dismissed the Civil Revision Application for want of prosecution.
Summary
The applicant, Ganesha Mohan, filed a Civil Revision Application No. 760 of 2023. On 24 February 2026, the Court ordered the application to be listed for dismissal on 4 March 2026, noting that no one appeared for the applicant. On the scheduled date, the applicant again failed to appear, indicating a loss of interest in prosecuting the matter. The Court held that such non‑appearance amounted to want of prosecution. Consequently, the revision application was dismissed. No substantive merits of the underlying dispute were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the Civil Revision Application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicant's failure to appear?
Subjects
- civil procedure
- dismissal
- want of prosecution
- revision application
- non‑appearance
Judgment
Renuka 22-cra-760-2023.docx
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL REVISION APPLICATION NO.760 OF 2023
Ganesha Mohan ...Applicant
V/s.
Ragini Mohan ...Respondent
______________
None for the Applicant.
Mr. Sachin J. Kadam for Respondent.
______________
CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATED: 04 March 2026.
P.C.:
1) On 24 February 2026, this court passed the following order:
“None appears for the Applicant. List the Application under caption ‘for
dismissal’ on 4 March 2026”.
2) Today again none has appeared on behalf of the Applicant.
It appears that the Applicant has lost interest in prosecuting the
Application.
3) Civil Revision Application is dismissed for want of
prosecution.
[SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.]
Digitally signed
by NEETA
NEETA SHAILESH
SHAILESH SAWANT
SAWANT Date:
2026.03.04 Page No. 1 of 1
18:56:29 +0530
04 March 2026
Checking your session…