Bombay High Court
GRINDWELL NORTON LIMITEDversusPREETHAM REDDY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- SHARMILA U DESHMUKH
Holding
A decree of admission may be passed based on the parties’ consent terms, thereby effecting settlement of the suit.
Summary
The commercial suit between Grindwell Norton Limited and Preetham Reddy was settled by mutual consent. The parties submitted consent terms, which were signed by the plaintiff’s attorney and the defendants, and were recorded by the Court. The defendants, through their advocate, agreed to a decree of admission covering prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (e) of the plaint, and the Court accepted the consent terms as an undertaking. Accordingly, the suit was decreed in accordance with those clauses and the court fees were ordered to be refunded. The Court Receiver’s report was disposed of, the receiver discharged without accounts, and all related costs were directed to be paid by the plaintiff within eight days. All interim applications were dismissed as they no longer required consideration.
Subjects
- settlement
- consent decree
- commercial suit
- court receiver
- decree of admission
- interim application disposal
Judgment
Digitally signed
by ARUNA
ARUNA SANDEEP
SANDEEP TALWALKAR
TALWALKAR Date:
2026.04.10
18:32:42 +0530
69.COMIP233.2025.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 233 OF 2025
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 11706 OF 2024
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2007 OF 2025
WITH
LEAVE PETITION (L) NO. 34392 OF 2023
WITH
COURT RECEIVER REPORT NO. 50 OF 2024
Grindwell Norton Limited. ...Plainti#
Versus
Preetham Reddy. ...Defendant
——————
Mr. Rohan Lopes a/w. Mr. Karan Khiani i/b. Rashmi Singh, Advocate for
the Plainti .
Mr. Saurabh Tyagi, Advocate for Defendant(through V.C.)
Mr. Satish P. More, A.S.O, Court Receiver.
——————
CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : APRIL 08, 2026
P. C. :
1. This Court is informed that the dispute has been settled between
the parties. The Consent Terms are tendered which are taken on
record and marked “X” for identi1cation.
Talwalkar 1 of 2
69.COMIP233.2025.doc
2. The Consent Terms are signed by the Constituted Attorney of
the Plainti# and by the Defendant No. 1 for himself and on behalf of
Defendant No. 3 and by Defendant No. 2 for herself and on behalf of
Defendant No. 4.
3. Defendants are represented by their Advocate who is present
virtually. The Advocate for the Defendants, on instructions, reiterates
that the Defendants submit to the decree of admission in terms of
prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (e) of the plaint. The statement made in
the Consent Terms is accepted as an undertaking given to this Court.
The Suit is decreed in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b), (c) and (e) of the
plaint. Refund of Court fees as per rules.
4. Court Receiver’s Report is disposed of. Court Receiver is
discharged without passing of accounts. All costs, charges and
expenses of the Court Receiver to be paid by the Plainti# within a
period of 8 days of demand being raised by the Court Receiver.
5. Interim Applications do not survive for consideration and stands
disposed of.
[SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.]
Talwalkar 2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.