Bombay High Court
MR. VIREN KANAYALAL VALANI AND ANR.versusMRS. MINAXI KANYALAL VALANI AND ANR.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and the civil application does not survive, leading to its disposal.
Summary
The appellants, Viren Kanayalal Valani and others, filed a first appeal (No.112 of 2019) and a civil application (No.358 of 2019) against the respondents, Minaxi Kanyalal Valani and others. The High Court examined whether the appeal and the accompanying civil application should proceed. The court found that the appeal had not been prosecuted adequately. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed for want of prosecution. The civil application was held not to survive the dismissal of the appeal and was therefore disposed of. Any interim relief that may have been granted earlier was vacated.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution
- Whether the civil application survives the dismissal of the appeal
Subjects
- appeal
- want of prosecution
- civil application
- interim relief
- disposal
Judgment
ppn 1 922.fa-112.19.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
by PRACHI
PRACHI PRANESH
PRANESH FIRST APPEAL NO.112 OF 2019
NANDIWADEKAR
NANDIWADEKAR WITH
Date: 2026.02.07
11:09:31 +0530
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.358 OF 2019
Viren Kanayalal Valani & Anr. ….Appellants
V/s.
Minaxi Kanyalal Valani & Anr. .…Respondents
----
None for the appellants.
None for the respondents.
----
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATED : 6 February 2026
P.C. :
1. None for the appellants.
2. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Civil application does
not survive and is accordingly disposed of. Interim relief, if any, stands
vacated.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.)
Checking your session…