Bombay High Court

SURYABHAN DHONDIRAM PADREversusTHE STATE OF MAH AND ANR

Disposal: PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Bench: SANJAY A DESHMUKH

Holding

Clerical errors in a court order may be corrected upon application without affecting the substantive merits of the case.

Summary

The High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, entertained several first appeals filed by various appellants against the State of Maharashtra. The matter before the court was a request to correct typographical errors in an order dated 24‑03‑2026, specifically the survey number of land (incorrectly shown as “39” instead of “33”) and the enhanced amount (shown as “Rs.80” instead of “Rs.81”). The appellants, through counsel, pointed out these inadvertent mistakes and sought their rectification. The court examined the submissions and found no substantive dispute, only clerical inaccuracies. Accordingly, the court ordered that the necessary corrections be made and the corrected order be uploaded. The motion for correction was therefore disposed of.

Subjects

clerical correction
court order
speaking to minutes
civil procedure
typographical error

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:14247
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
1 902-FA-1150-12-Speaking.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

FIRST APPEAL NO. 1150 OF 2012

Narayan s/o. Dhondiba Padre .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 569 OF 2012

Sambhaji s/o. Hariba Padre .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
...
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1152 OF 2012

Suryabhan s/o. Dhondiba Padre .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 572 OF 2012

Shivaji s/o. Bachesaheb Salunke .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 574 OF 2012

Hanmant s/o. Nagorao Salunke .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 573 OF 2012

Jagannath s/o. Nagorao Salunke,
Died, through L.Rs. 1A.Prafulla s/o.
Jaggannathrao Salunke and another .. Appellants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //
2 902-FA-1150-12-Speaking.odt

AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1151 OF 2012

Ramrao s/o. Laxman Padre, Died, through L.Rs.
Shivaji Ramrao Padre (Salunke) and others .. Appellants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
AND
FIRST APPEAL NO. 571 OF 2012

Anant s/o. Nagorao Salunke .. Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and another .. Respondents
…
Mr. Satish S. Manale, Advocate for Appellants;
Mr. S. B. Jadhav, A.G.P. for Respondents
...
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 15-04-2026
PER COURT:-

1. These matters are moved for speaking to minutes of the
order dated 24.03.2026.
2. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that in the chart
shown in paragraph no.1 of the said order, in column No.(3) at
Serial Nos.4 to 7, Survey Number of the land is inadvertently
typed as “39” instead of “33”. So also, in sub-clause (a) of clause
No.(II) of the operative part of the said order, the enhanced
amount of “Rs.80” is typed instead of “Rs.81”. The same may be
corrected.
3. In view of above, necessary corrections be carried out in the
said order. The corrected order be uploaded.
4. Motion stands disposed of.

[SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.]
rrd

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…