Bombay High Court
THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusSMT. SHOBHA BABASAHEB BABAR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal was allowed to be withdrawn and the court fee and statutory deposit were ordered to be refunded.
Summary
The Administrative Officer of New India Assurance Co. Ltd. filed a pursis before the Lok Adalat indicating that the company no longer wishes to prosecute its appeal (First Appeal No. 1207 of 2015) and seeks permission to withdraw it. The panel recorded the pursis and, applying procedural law, allowed the withdrawal, thereby disposing of the appeal as withdrawn. The court further directed that the court fee stamp and statutory deposit made for the appeal be refunded to the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. No substantive merits of the original dispute were considered, as the appeal was withdrawn. The decision reflects the court's authority to permit withdrawal of appeals and to order restitution of fees when an appeal is abandoned.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal pending before the Lok Adalat can be withdrawn by the appellant.
- Whether the court fee and statutory deposit made for the appeal are refundable upon withdrawal.
Subjects
- withdrawal of appeal
- court fee refund
- Lok Adalat
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- procedural law
Judgment
62-FA-1207-2015 (C).doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 1207 OF 2015
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. ...Appellant
Versus
Smt. Shobha Babasaheb Babar And Others ...Respondents
…..
Adv. Deepali Desai, Advocate for Appellant
Mr. Abhishek Mane, Administrative Officer, present.
…..
CORAM : PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
(Head of the Panel)
KALPANA S. HORE,
(Retired District Judge)
Member
RAHUL R. PATIL,
(Panel Advocate), Member
DATE : 14th MARCH, 2026.
P.C:
1. The Administrative Officer, Mr. Abhishek Mane on behalf of the
appellant – New India Assurance Company Ltd. is present before the
Lok Adalat.
2. The Administrative Officer has tendered a pursis stating that the
appellant – Assurance Company does not want to prosecute the present
appeal and seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal in terms of
the pursis. The same is taken on record and marked ‘X’ for
ZIP 1 of 2
62-FA-1207-2015 (C).doc
identification.
3. Accordingly, the appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn.
4. The appellant – Assurance Company is entitled to refund of the
Court fee stamp and the statutory deposit be remitted back to the
concerned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal.
(RAHUL R. PATIL) (KALPANA S. HORE) (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.)
Panel Advocate Retired District Judge Head of the Panel
Member Member
ZIP 2 of 2
Checking your session…