Bombay High Court

NARKU NAYAKU CHOUGULE and ANR.versusSHRI. DATTU BHAU PATIL and ORS.

Disposal: Allowed To be withdrawn
Bench: PRAVIN SHESHRAO PATIL NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

Holding

The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

The appellants, Narku Nayaku Chougule and another, filed an appeal before the National Lok Adalat Civil Appellate Jurisdiction. During the hearing, the appellant's administrative officer, Mr. Sagar Tukaram Samant, expressed that the appeal should not be prosecuted. The court permitted the appellants to withdraw the appeal. It was also directed that the stamp duty paid could be refunded in accordance with the applicable rules. Consequently, the court disposed of the appeal as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether an appeal pending before the National Lok Adalat can be withdrawn by the appellant after filing

Subjects

withdrawal of appeal
National Lok Adalat
civil procedure
stamp duty

Judgment

                                                      22-FA-1767-2007 (C).doc


              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                      CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
                     BEFORE THE NATIONAL LOK ADALAT
                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                       FIRST APPEAL NO. 1767 OF 2007


Narku Nayaku Chougule And Anr.                                ...Appellants
       Versus
Shri. Dattu Bhau Patil And Ors.                               ...Respondents


                                   …..
Adv. Jyoti Pande (through V.C.), for the Appellant.
                                   …..


                                   CORAM :     PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.
                                               (Head of the Panel)
                                               KALPANA S. HORE,
                                               (Retired District Judge)
                                               Member
                                               RAHUL R. PATIL,
                                               (Panel Advocate), Member
                                    DATE :     14th MARCH, 2026.

P.C:


1.         The learned counsel for the appellants and Administrative Officer

of the appellant- Assurance Company Ltd., Mr. Sagar Tukaram Samant,

who is present in the Court states that he does not want to prosecute

the present appeal. Hence, the appellants are permitted to withdraw the

present appeal.

2.         The stamp duty which is paid is permitted to be withdrawn as per

the Rules.


     ZIP                                                                1 of 2
                                                     22-FA-1767-2007 (C).doc


3.         The present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.




 (RAHUL R. PATIL) (KALPANA S. HORE)              (PRAVIN S. PATIL, J.)
  Panel Advocate  Retired District Judge           Head of the Panel
     Member              Member




     ZIP                                                               2 of 2

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…