Bombay High Court
ALI HASAN S/O ABDUL AHAD IDRISI AND ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA THR.GENERAL MANAGER
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellants Ali Hasan and others filed a first appeal against the Union of India (Western Railway). No counsel appeared for the appellants on 8 January 2026 and again on the hearing date. The Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution, vacated any interim relief, and ordered that any pending civil application be disposed of. The respondent was represented by T. J. Pandian assisted by Gautam Modanwal. The judgment was delivered by Justice Jitendra Jain.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- procedural law
- dismissal for want of prosecution
- civil appellate jurisdiction
Judgment
ppn 1 9.fa-18-18.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Digitally signed
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
by PRACHI
PRACHI PRANESH
PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR
NANDIWADEKAR
Date: 2026.01.17 FIRST APPEAL NO.18 OF 2018
13:18:10 +0530
Ali Hasan S/o Abdul Ahand Idrisi & Ors. …Appellants
V/s.
Union of India, through General Manager,
Western Railway .…Respondent
----
None for the Appellant.
Mr. T. J. Pandian a/w Mr. Gautam Modanwal for the respondent.
----
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATED : 17th January 2026
P.C. :
1. On 8 January 2026, none appeared for the appel`lant. Therefore, the
matter was kept today for ‘dismissal.’ Today also, there is no appearance on
behalf of the appellant.
2. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim relief, if any,
stands vacated. Civil application, if any, does not survive and is accordingly
disposed of.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.)
Checking your session…