Bombay High Court

DADARAO GANPATRAO KAVLEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

Disposal: PARTLY ALLOWED AND PARTLY DISMISSED
Bench: SHAILESH P BRAHME

Holding

The Court allowed the appeals partly, awarding the appellants Rs.2400 per Are and interest under Sections 28 and 34, but denied interest and statutory benefits for the delayed period.

Summary

The Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, heard a group of first appeals challenging the compensation awarded for lands acquired in Kedarwakadi village for the "Nimmna Dudhana" project. The appellants, members of the KavaLe family, sought enhancement of the compensation rate from Rs.1500 per Are (for jirayat land) and Rs.750 per Are (for pot kharab land) to Rs.2400 per Are, claiming parity with a prior decision. The State contested the claim, arguing that the earlier award was proper. Relying on a precedent (First Appeal No.1896 of 2021) and the principles laid down in State of Maharashtra v. Kailash Shiva Rangari, the Court held that the appellants are entitled to the higher rate of Rs.2400 per Are and interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Maharashtra Land Acquisition Act, but not for the delayed period. The Court allowed the appeals partly, modified the award accordingly, and ordered the appellants to pay deficit court fees.

Issues considered

Whether the appellants are entitled to an enhanced compensation rate of Rs.2400 per Are for jirayat land.
Whether interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Maharashtra Land Acquisition Act is payable on the award.
Whether statutory benefits for the period of delay are applicable.

Legislation cited

Maharashtra Land Acquisition Act, 1960 — s. 28, 34

Subjects

land acquisition
compensation
jirayat land
pot kharab
interest
statutory benefits
Maharashtra

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:2190

(1) FA-2037-25+++

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD

22 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2037 OF 2025

DADARAO GANPATRAO KAVLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND
ORS.
AND
23 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2150 OF 2025

DATTARAO DADARAO KAVALE DIED THR LRS SARUBAI AND ANR
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND
ORS.
AND
25 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3235 OF 2025

ANNA NARAYAN KAVALE DIED THR LRS DNYNOBA ANNA KAVLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND
ORS.
AND
26 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3236 OF 2025

ACHUTRAO SAHEBRAO KAVLE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND
ORS.
AND
27 FIRST APPEAL NO. 3237 OF 2025

GANPAT GOVINDRAO KAVLE (DIED) THR. LRS SUNDAR GANPAT KAVALE
AND ORS
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND
ORS.
AND
(2) FA-2037-25+++

74 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2486 OF 2025

SANJIVANI BABASAHEB KAVHALE (DIED) THR. LRS PRADIP BABASAHEB
KAVHALE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND
ORS.
...
Shri. Kumar Gaurav More a/w. Shri. Firoj Ahmad Shirpurkar, Advocate for
Appellants in all F.A.
Shri. S. V. Hange, Shri. N. D. Raje and Shri. S. N. Morampalle, AGPs for
Respondent-s/State in respective F.A.
Mrs. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar, Shri. R. A. Tambe, Shri. S. B. Kade,
Advocate for Acquiring Body in respective F.A.
…

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 17.01.2026

FINAL ORDER :-
. Heard both sides finally.

2. These appeals can be decided by common order as they are

squarely covered by the consistent view taken by this Court. One such order

dated 05.01.2026 passed in First Appeal No.1896 of 2021 is placed on record.

On the ground of parity, the appellants are claiming enhancement to

Rs.2400/- per Are.

3. Following are the material particulars of the appeals :
(3) FA-2037-25+++

F.A.No. LAR No. Gut No. Area Land type Date of Date of Rate Rate
notification award granted by awarded by
u/s. 4 u/s.11 SLAO Reference
Court
2037 OF 2025 149/2012 74A 0H, 97R jirayat 13/05/1995 31/03/1999 623/R for 1500/-R for
70A 97R&0H, 03 jirayat jirayat 750/-
03R pot R pot 585/R for for pot
kharab kharab pot kharab kharab
1H, 69R jirayat
2150 OF 2025 150/2012 24/1-A 2H, 25R jirayat 13/05/1995 31/03/1999 531/R for 1500/-R for
jirayat jirayat
3235 OF 2025 166/2012 1/1-C 1H, 01R jirayat 13/05/1995 31/03/1999 625/R for 1500/-R for
jirayat jirayat
3236 OF 2025 151/2012 1/3A 1H, 08R& 1h, 08R & 13/05/1995 31/03/1999 587 for 1500/-R for
08R pot 08R pot jirayat jirayat 750/-
kharab kharab for pot
kharab
3237 OF 2025 150/2012 74/A 1H, 75R& 1H, 75R& 13/05/1995 31/03/1999 630/R for 1500/-R for
03R pot 03R pot jirayat jirayat
kharab kharab
2486 OF 2025 167/2012 22/2 1H, 93R& 1H, 93R& 13/05/1995 31/03/1999 585/R 1500/-R for
09R pot 09R pot jirayat jirayat 750/-
kharab kharab for pot
kharab

4. The submissions of the appellants are contested by the

respondents.

5. The lands from village Kedarwakadi, Taluka Mantha, District,

Jalna have been acquired for “Nimmna Dudhana” prject. The notification was

issued on 13.05.1995. Thereafter, award was passed on 31.03.1999. All lands

are Jirayat lands and some portions are classified as pot kharab. The Reference

Court enhanced the compensation to Rs.1500/- per Are for jirayat land and

Rs.750/- per Are for pot kharab land.

6. The present appeals are squarely covered by order dated

05.01.2026 passed in First Appeal No.1896 of 2021. In that case also, land
(4) FA-2037-25+++

from village Kedarwakadi was acquired. The notification was issued on

20.03.1995, preceding one year of 31.03.1996 for which the standard rate

was 2500/- per Are. The appellants are also entitled to have rate of Rs.2400/-

per Are.

7. I, therefore, pass following order :

ORDER

a. First Appeals are allowed partly.
b. The appellants shall be awarded rate of Rs.2400/- per Are.
c. The appellants shall be entitled to the interest under
Section 28 and 34 of the Act as per full Bench Judgment in State
of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari [2016 AIR (Bom.)141].
d. The appellants shall not be entitled to the interest and
statutory benefits for the delayed period.
e. Save and except above, the impugned judgment and award
passed by the Reference Court shall stand unaltered.
f. The appellants shall pay deficit court fees.
g. R and P be sent back to the Reference Court.
h. Award be drawn accordingly.

( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. )
PRW

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…