Bombay High Court
SUNITA SOPAN GAIKWAD AND ORS.versusPENOSH SERVICES/TRANSPORT AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dismissed
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Summary
The appellants, Sunita Sopan Gaikwad & Ors., filed an appeal against Penosh Services/Transport & Ors. but failed to appear despite a court notice. The High Court noted the lack of prosecution of the appeal. Consequently, the Court dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution. Any interim relief that had been granted was vacated. No further orders were made.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution
Subjects
- appeal
- prosecution
- interim relief
- vacated
Judgment
ppn 1 13.fa-2410.05.doc
Digitally signed
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
by PRACHI
PRACHI
PRANESH
PRANESH CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
NANDIWADEKAR
NANDIWADEKAR
Date: 2026.07.08
11:14:48 +0530 FIRST APPEAL NO.2410 OF 2005
Sunita Sopan Gaikwad & Ors. ….Appellants
(Orig. applicants)
V/s.
Penosh Services/Transport & Ors. .…Respondents
(Orig. Opponents)
----
None for the appellants.
None for the respondents.
----
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATED : 7 July 2026
P.C. :
1. None for the appellants inspite of the Court notice.
2. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
3. Interim relief, if any, stands vacated.
(JITENDRA JAIN, J.)
Checking your session…