Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONversusSUDHAKAR GANGADHARRAO SINGEWAR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court held that the compensation awarded was within the permissible four‑times limit and therefore dismissed the appeals.

Summary

The Municipal Commissioner of Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation appealed against several civil judgments in which the reference court had awarded compensation to various respondents. The State Government, through a resolution dated 03.11.2016 (with subsequent corrigenda), stated it would not challenge the reference court's award provided the compensation did not exceed four times the amount granted by the SLAO. The learned Advocate General argued that the compensation awarded was within this four‑times ceiling. The Court examined the Government resolution and found no basis to intervene since the compensation did not surpass the stipulated limit. Consequently, the Court dismissed all the appeals and ordered the disposal of any pending civil applications related to the matters.

Issues considered

  • Whether the compensation awarded by the reference court exceeds four times the compensation granted by the SLAO.
  • Whether the State Government's resolution precludes judicial intervention in the reference court's award.

Subjects

  • compensation
  • municipal corporation
  • appeal
  • reference court
  • government resolution
  • civil procedure
  • dismissal

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:26610
                                           1 of 5                14-FA.1836.2013



                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              14 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1836 OF 2013

                    THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                                     MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                               VERSUS
                       SHANKAR GANGADHARRAO SINGEWAR AND OTHERS
                                                  ...
               Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
               Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
               Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                                                  ...

                                           AND
                               FIRST APPEAL NO. 2517 OF 2013

                    THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                                     MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                               VERSUS
                       MANORAMABAI VASANTRAO KHEDKAR AND OTHERS
                                                  …
               Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
               Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
               Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

                                           AND
                               FIRST APPEAL NO. 2521 OF 2013

                  NANDED WAGHALA CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NANDED
                                               VERSUS
                            ABDUL MUBIN ABDUL RASHID AND OTHERS
                                                  …
               Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
               Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.

                                           AND
                               FIRST APPEAL NO. 2526 OF 2013

                     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                                  MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                         VERSUS
                        RATANSINGH AMARSINGH BASIWALE AND OTHERS
                              2 of 5               14-FA.1836.2013



                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Amit A. Mukhedkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2520 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
      SHARADCHANDRA BHALCHANDRA SHAHU AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2515 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
           MOHANSING RATANSINGH LANGRI AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2519 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
                 ONKAR RATAN CHAVAN AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2524 OF 2013

    THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                              3 of 5              14-FA.1836.2013



                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
          KUSUMBAI PADMAKAR SHINGEWAR AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2522 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
                SY. KHAJA SALIM PASHA AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and
2.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2523 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
               LAXMAN MANIRAM AHER AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

                             AND
                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 2518 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
               HASHAM ALI RAMZAN ALI AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
                               4 of 5                    14-FA.1836.2013




                              AND
                  FIRST APPEAL NO. 2525 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
        NANAK KAUR DHARAMSINGH SANDHU AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No.1.

                              AND
                  FIRST APPEAL NO. 2516 OF 2013

     THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, NANDED WAGHALA CITY
                      MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
                                VERSUS
       SUDHAKAR GANGADHARRAO SINGEWAR AND OTHERS
                                   …
Mr. R. K. Ingole, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. R. B. Dhaware, AGP for Respondent-State.
                                   ...

                        CORAM :         SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.
                        DATE    :       2nd JULY, 2026

P.C.:-

1.       Heard learned Advocates for the respective parties.


2.       The appearance of Mr. Mrigesh D. Narwadkar, learned

Advocate, stands discharged. Mr. Ingole, learned Advocate, appears for

the Appellant.


3.       Learned AGP submits that the compensation granted by the

learned Reference Court is within four times the compensation granted
                                           5 of 5                  14-FA.1836.2013



          by the SLAO.


          4.        In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution

          No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with

          Corrigendum     dated   23.02.2017        and   13.08.2018   to   the      said

          Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference,

          if compensation is enhanced only upto four times.


          5.        Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the

          impugned orders. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed.


          6.          In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil

          Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.



                                             (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.)


Tauseef


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.