Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MR. REHAN M. SHAIKHversusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The eight‑week period mentioned in paragraph 10(E) commences from 12 June 2026.

Summary

The appellant, Mr. Rehan M. Shaikh, filed a praecipe seeking clarification of the commencement date for the eight‑week period prescribed in paragraph 10(E) of the order dated 24 March 2026. He argued that the order was uploaded on 12 June 2026, and therefore the time limit should be calculated from that date. The Court examined the procedural requirement and noted the absence of any indication in the original order about the upload date. It clarified that the eight‑week period will indeed start from 12 June 2026. The remainder of the original order was left unchanged and the praecipe was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • From which date should the eight‑week period prescribed in paragraph 10(E) of the order dated 24 March 2026 be calculated?

Subjects

  • procedural law
  • time limit
  • clarification
  • praecipe
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                             KVM
                                                                   1/2
                                                                                 PRAECIPE 1 - FA 27 OF 2022.doc



          Digitally signed
          by KANCHAN
                                            IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
KANCHAN VINOD
        MAYEKAR
VINOD   Date:
MAYEKAR 2026.06.17
          15:54:46
          +0530
                                                   CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                    FIRST APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2022

                             MR. REHAN M. SHAIKH                                   ….. APPELLANT/
                                                                                   CLAIMANT

                                       VS

                             UNION OF INDIA THROUGH
                             THE GENERAL MANAGER,
                             CENTRAL RAILWAY, C.S.M.T.,
                             MUMBAI                                                ….. RESPONDENT

                             None for the Appellant.

                             Adv. T. J. Pandian a/w. Adv. T. C. Subramanian for the Respondent.

                                                                CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

                                                                DATE     : 16 JUNE, 2026

                             P.C. :-

                             1)               This matter is moved by way of a praecipe for speaking to

                             minutes of the order dated 24 March, 2026 by the learned advocate

                             appearing for the respondent.

                             2)               He submits that the impugned order dated 24 March,

                             2026 was uploaded only on 12 June, 2026. Hence, a period of eight

                             weeks as mentioned in paragraph no. 10(E) should start from 12

                             June, 2026.        He submits that the impugned judgment does not

                             mention when it was uploaded by the Personal Assistant of this Court.
KVM
                                 2/2
                                              PRAECIPE 1 - FA 27 OF 2022.doc


3)         For seeking clarification, it is hereby clarified that the

period of eight weeks mentioned in paragraph 10(E) would start from

12 June, 2026.

4)         Rest of the order remains unchanged.

5)         Praecipe is disposed of.



                                          [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.