Bombay High Court
MRS MANDAKINI ARUN JANGAMversusMR ARUN DIGAMBAR JANGAM AND ANR
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
- Bench
- NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Mandakini Arjun Jangam filed a civil appeal (First Appeal No. 675 of 2015) in the High Court of Bombay against Arun Digambar Jangam and another. The matter was listed but no counsel or parties appeared on either side. The appeal had been pending since 2015 without any prosecution. Justice Shivkumar Dige, observing the lack of prosecution and the lapse of time, dismissed the appeal. The order was pronounced on 11 January 2024.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non‑prosecution
Subjects
- appeal
- non‑prosecution
- civil procedure
- high court
Judgment
Shantanu Dhudum 272-FA-675-2015.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO. 675 OF 2015
Mandakini Arjun Jangam ….Appellant
Versus
Arun Digambar Jangam & Anr. ….Respondents
-----
None present for the Appellant.
None present for the Respondents.
-----
Digitally signed
SHANTANU
SHANKARSA
by SHANTANU
SHANKARSA
DHUDUM
CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
DHUDUM Date: 2024.01.12
18:08:14 +0530
DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2024.
P.C. :
1. None present for the Appellant.
2. Appeal is of year 2015.
3. The appeal is dismissed “for non-prosecution”.
(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)
1/1
Checking your session…