Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VISHNU LIMBAJI KANSEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE COLLECTOR JALNA AND ORS.

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The appellants are entitled to a compensation rate of Rs.2400 per Are, without interest for the delayed period, but with interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act as per precedent.

Summary

The appellants, Vishnu L. Kanse and Sumanbai D. Kanse, challenged a 2009 judgment and award concerning land acquired for the Kasura Bruhat Project, seeking a compensation rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity. Their land, classified as dry, had previously been awarded Rs.399.50 and Rs.600 per Are. The State of Maharashtra, represented by the acquiring body, opposed any enhancement, arguing no independent case existed. The Court, relying on its consistent precedent of awarding Rs.2400 per Are for dry land and the principle of parity, granted the higher rate but denied interest for the delayed period, while allowing interest under Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act per a Full Bench precedent. The judgment affirmed the original award apart from the revised rate, ordered the appellants to pay court fee deficit, and disposed of the appeals.

Issues considered

  • Whether the appellants are entitled to an enhanced compensation rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity.
  • Whether interest and statutory benefits are payable for the period of delay in payment.
  • Whether Sections 28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act apply to the compensation awarded.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • compensation
  • parity
  • interest
  • statutory benefits
  • dry land
  • Kasura Bruhat Project
  • Land Acquisition Act

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:9273
                                                                         91-FA-685-2026.odt




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                 BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 FIRST APPEAL NO. 685 OF 2026

                                     Vishnu Limbaji Kanse
                                           VERSUS
                 The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And Ors.

                             WITH FIRST APPEAL NO. 684 OF 2026

                              Sumanbai Dattatraya Kanse And Anr
                                            VERSUS
                 The State Of Maharashtra Through The Collector Jalna And Ors.
                                                ...
          Mr. V. D. Bhise, Advocate for Appellant
          Mr. N. D. Raje, AGP for Respondents
          Mr. R. A. Tambe, Advocate for Respondent No. 3
                                               ***

                                               CORAM      : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J
                                               DATE       : MARCH 04, 2026

          PC :

          1.           Heard learned Counsels for both sides. Appeals are taken up for

          final disposal with consent of parties.


          2.           Appellants are challenging the common judgment and award

          dated 31.01.2009 passed in LAR No. 115/2000 and 117/2000. They are

          claiming rate of Rs.2400 per Are on the ground of parity. They have placed

          on record order passed by this Court on 23.02.2026 awarding rate of

          Rs.2400 per Are.


          3.           Mr. Tambe, learned Counsel for acquiring body, opposed the

          submissions. It is submitted that no independent case for enhancement has

                                            PAGE 1 OF 3
                                                                              91-FA-685-2026.odt




        been made out by the Appellants.


        4.              Appellants’ lands are from village Daithana, which stood

        acquired for Kasura Bruhat Project. Following are the material particulars:

Sr. F.A. No.            Gut No.    U/sec 4      U/sec 11   S.L.A.O.     LR.        Tye pf land
No. (L.A.R. No.)        (Area)     Notification Award date awarded      Reference Reference
                                   Date                    Per R rate   Court      Court awarded
                                                                        awarded
                                                                        rate per R
91. 685/2026        35        29.06.1996 03.07.1997 Rs.399.50/- Rs.600/-            Dry Land
A (115/2000)        OO H 41 R                       (for Jirayat)
    Vishnu L. Kanse
B.   684/2026           34        29.06.1996 03.07.1997 Rs.399.50 Rs.600/-          Dry Land
     (117/2000)         OO H 41 R                       (for Jirayat)
     Sumanbai      D.
     Kanse & Or

        5.              Undisputedly, the classification of the land to be dry one has not

        been disputed by the parties. This Court has been consistent in awarding

        rate of Rs.2400 per Are for dry land relying upon the consistent view being

        taken by this Court in various matters. One such order passed in FA No.

        445/2025 is placed on record. Appeals are squarely covered by the view

        taken by this Court.


        6.              Considering the location of the land, the project and the rates

        on the ground of parity, Appellants are entitled to receive the rate of

        Rs.2400 per Are. I, therefore, pass following order:

                                               ORDER

             (I)    Appellants in both the appeals are entitled to receive rate
                    of Rs.2400/- per Are for the acquired lands.

                                             PAGE 2 OF 3
                                                                  91-FA-685-2026.odt




   (II)    The Appellants shall not be entitled to receive interest and
           statutory benefits for the delayed period.

   (III)   The Appellants shall be entitled to receive interest
           U/Sec.28 and 34 of the Land Acquisition Act in view of the
           judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the matter of
           State of Maharashtra Vs. Kailash Shiva Rangari [2016 AIR
           (Bom.) 141].

   (IV)    Save and except above, the impugned judgment and award
           shall remained unaltered.

   (V)     The Appellants shall pay the deficit Court fees.

   (VI)    Award be drawn up accordingly.

   (VII)   Appeals stand disposed of.

   (VIII) Pending civil application(s), if any, stands disposed of.


                                                 (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.)
Umesh




                                  PAGE 3 OF 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.