Bombay High Court
DR. TANAJI DNYANESHWAR KADversusMRS. LAXMI TANAJI KAD (MAIDEN NAME LAXMI NARSAPPA TALARE)
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution and any interim relief is vacated.
Summary
Dr. Tanaji Dnyaneshwar Kad filed a civil appeal before the High Court of Bombay against Laxmi Tanaji Kad. The appellant failed to appear on the scheduled hearing date of 6 January 2026, and again on 13 January 2026 when the matter was listed for dismissal. The Court, giving the appellant a further opportunity, noted the continued non‑appearance and proceeded to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. Consequently, any interim relief that may have been granted earlier was vacated. The judgment reflects the Court’s adherence to procedural rules requiring active prosecution of appeals.
Issues considered
- Whether the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the appellant's failure to appear.
Subjects
- civil procedure
- appeal
- want of prosecution
- interim relief
- dismissal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:1246
Sayyed 7-FA.910.2016.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
FIRST APPEAL NO.910 OF 2016
Dr. Tanaji Dnyaneshwar Kad ...Appellant
Versus
Laxmi Tanaji Kad
(maiden name Laxmi Narsappa Talare) ...Respondent
_____________________________________________________
None for the Appellant.
_____________________________________________________
CORAM : JITENDRA JAIN, J.
DATE : 13 JANUARY 2026
P.C.:
1. On 6 January 2026, none appeared for the appellant and,
therefore, to give one more opportunity the appeal is listed today under
the caption for dismissal. Today also, there is no appearance on behalf
of the appellant.
2. Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Interim relief, if
any, stands vacated.
[ JITENDRA JAIN, J. ]
Signed by: Sayyed Saeed Ali
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 13/01/2026 17:36:54 1 of 1
Checking your session…