Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GO DIGIT GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., PUNEversusDRAUPADA NAMDEV PATIL AND ORS.

Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court approved the parties' settlement, permitting the claimants to withdraw Rs.11,68,034 and the insurer to withdraw the remaining balance with interest, thereby fully and finally settling the claim.

Summary

The appellant, Go Digit General Insurance Co., appealed a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award concerning a motor accident claim by Draupada Namdev Patil and others. The appellant had previously deposited Rs.37,41,487 with the Tribunal, of which the claimants had withdrawn Rs.24,31,966. The insurer, through its legal manager, offered a lump‑sum settlement of Rs.36,00,000 as full and final settlement. The claimants' counsel accepted the offer. The High Court disposed of the appeal by approving the settlement, authorising the claimants to withdraw a further Rs.11,68,034 and allowing the insurer to withdraw the balance with interest, thereby concluding the dispute.

Issues considered

  • Whether the parties may settle the motor accident claim by a lump‑sum payment and withdraw the remaining amounts from the Tribunal
  • Whether the High Court can approve such a settlement and direct the withdrawal of funds

Subjects

  • settlement
  • motor accident claim
  • insurance
  • appeal
  • full and final settlement
  • withdrawal of funds

Judgment

                                                                                     2-FA-966-2023.DOC


                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                        CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR
           Digitally signed

HARISH
           by HARISH
          VITHAL
                                        CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
VITHAL    CHAUDHARI
CHAUDHARI Date:
           2026.03.19
           14:07:37 +0530
                                         FIRST APPEAL NO. 966 OF 2023

                    Go Digit General Insurance Co. Ltd., Pune               ...Appellant
                         VERSUS
                    Draupada Namdev Patil And Ors.                          ...Respondents


                                                        ***
                    Mr. Faizkhan Firozkah Pathan, Legal Manager of Appellant.
                    Mr. Tejpal Ingale a/w Saurabh Patil for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
                                                        ***
                                            CORAM        :       M. M. SATHAYE, J.
                                            DATE         :       18th MARCH, 2026.
                    P.C.

                    1.        Heard learned counsel for the parties.


                    2.        The Appellant is Insurance Company, who has challenged the
                    impugned judgment and award dated 15.12.2022 passed in Motor
                    Accident Claims Petition (MACP) No.51/2020 by Motor Accident Claims
                    Tribunal (MACT), Sangli.


                    3.        Pursuant to earlier order passed by this Court, the Appellant
                    Insurance Company has deposited an amount of Rs.37,41,487/- with the
                    concerned Tribunal. Out of the said amount, Respondent Nos. 1 to 4
                    (Claimants) have already withdrawn Rs.24,31,966/-


                    4.        Today, Mr. Faizkhan Firozkhan Pathan, Legal Manager of
                    Appellant Insurance Company is present in the Court, who has produced
                    on record his self attested ID proof and the authority letter dated
                    05.12.2025 authorizing him to appear, sign and plead for the purpose of



       Harish                                                1
                                                                            2-FA-966-2023.DOC


         settlement. The authority letter and self attested ID proof is taken on
         record and marked as “X (Colly)” for identification.


         5.            Mr. Pathan states on instructions that the Appellant Insurance
         Company is willing to settle the dispute by agreeing to Rs. 36,00,000/- as a
         lump-sum amount towards full and final settlement of claim. He states that
         total     amount      of   Rs.    36,00,000/-    can   be   withdraw    by     the
         Respondents/Claimants, out of which, partial amount as indicated above,
         has been already withdrawn. Statement Accepted.


         6.            Mr. Ingale, learned counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 /
         Claimants, on instructions, agreed to the above amount of Rs. 36,00,000/-
         as full and final settlement of the claim.


         7.            Considering the aforesaid, the First Appeal is disposed of by
         passing following order.
                                                    ORDER

                 (I)   Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 Claimants shall be entitled to
                       withdraw jointly further amount of Rs. 11,68,034/- from
                       the the concerned Tribunal. The Appellant Insurance
                       Company hereby gives no objection for such withdrawal.
                       On such further withdrawal, the concerned claim shall
                       stand settled fully and finally.

                 (ii) The Appellant Insurance Company shall be entitled to
                       withdraw from concerned Tribunal the remaining amount
                       along with accrued interest, if any.

                 (iii) Statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- deposited with this Court
                       (Registry) shall be transferred to the Concerned Tribunal
                       along with accrued interest, if any.


Harish                                               2
                                                                          2-FA-966-2023.DOC


              (iv) The Appellant Insurance Company shall also be entitled to
                   withdraw the statutory amount with accrued interest, if
                   any.

         8.        Considering that the Appeal is disposed of by way of aforesaid
         settlement, the Registry is directed to refund Court fees as per Rules.


         9.        All concerned to act on duly authenticated or digitally signed
         copy of this order.

                                                            [M. M. SATHAYE, J.]




Harish                                          3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.