Bombay High Court
SHANKAR KACHRU KEDAREversusPUNJABAI SHANKAR KEDARE AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The appeal is dismissed in default.
Summary
The appellant, Shankar Kachru Kedare, filed an appeal in the Bombay High Court Family Court against Punjabai Shankar Kedare and another. The appellant's counsel was absent, and the appellant failed to provide a fresh address for Respondent No.2 despite being granted accommodations. The court noted the appellant's apparent loss of interest in the proceedings. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal in default for non‑appearance and non‑compliance with procedural requirements.
Issues considered
- Whether an appeal can be dismissed for default due to the appellant's non‑appearance and failure to furnish a fresh address of a respondent.
Subjects
- default judgment
- family court appeal
- procedural default
- non‑appearance
Judgment
908-FCA-3-14.odt
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
908 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2014
Shankar Kachru Kedare
VERSUS
Punjabai Shankar Kedare And Another
......
CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND
HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
DATE : 28 JANUARY, 2026
PER COURT :-
1. We have seen the order dated 20.01.2026. Learned advocate for
the appellant is absent. It appears from the record that the appellant has
not provided fresh address of the respondent No.2 though
accommodations were granted.
2. Now, as the learned advocate appearing for the appellant is also
absent, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in the matter.
Under such circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed in default.
[ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
S P Rane
Checking your session…