Bombay High Court
USHA SHAMRAO KHUBIKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- M S KARNIKS M MODAK
Holding
The Court held that, in the interest of justice, the delay was condoned and the order of 29 May 2017 was recalled, thereby restoring the writ petition to the file.
Summary
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.8783 of 2007 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. An order dated 29 May 2017 had been passed by the High Court, which the petitioners sought to set aside. The petitioners filed an interim application (No.10794 of 2024) seeking condonation of delay and restoration of the writ petition to the file. The Court, after hearing oral submissions, held that in the interest of justice the delay could be condoned. Consequently, the order of 29 May 2017 was recalled and the writ petition was restored, and the interim application was allowed.
Issues considered
- Whether the delay in filing the interim application can be condoned?
- Whether the order dated 29 May 2017 should be recalled and the writ petition restored to the file?
Subjects
- interim application
- condonation of delay
- writ petition
- restoration of petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- interest of justice
Judgment
2026:BHC-AS:8218-DB
Bhogale 5.ia-10794-2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10794 OF 2024
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.8783 OF 2007
Usha Shamrao Khubikar … Applicant
In the matter of
Usha Shamrao Khubikar … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. .… Respondents
****
Adv. Nitin P. Deshpande a/w Adv. Rachana Harpale, Adv. Santosh
Kurade, Adv. Anjali Shinde, for the Applicant/Petitioner.
Mr. A. I. Patel, Addl.G.P. a/w Ms. Rupali Shinde, AGP, for
Respondent Nos.1, 2 and 5-State.
****
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
S. M. MODAK, JJ.
DATE : 17th FEBRUARY, 2026
P.C. :
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned Additional Government Pleader opposed the
application. However, we feel that in the interest of justice, the
application deserves to be allowed in view of the oral submissions
made by learned counsel for the applicant and for the reasons
stated in the application by condoning the delay. The order dated
29th May 2017 passed by this Court is recalled. The Writ Petition
No.8783 of 2007 is restored to file.
1
Bhogale 5.ia-10794-2024.odt
3. The Interim Application is allowed and accordingly
disposed of.
(S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Signed by: Pradnya Bhogale
Designation: PA To Honourable Judge
Date: 18/02/2026 10:20:27 2
Checking your session…