Bombay High Court
SHREE KUTCHHI BHANUSHALI SEVA SAMAJ TRUST THR. ITS TRUSTEE DINESH CHANDRAversusABDUL SATTAR BIPAT KHAN
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
- Bench
- MILIND N JADHAV
Holding
The appellate court ordered the trial court to expeditiously determine the notice of motion, hear the intervenor, grant a rejoinder, and restrain coercive steps, thereby disposing of the appeal without prejudice to the merits.
Summary
The appellant, Abdul Sattar Bipat Khan, appealed an ad‑interim order issued by the trial court in a suit against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai. The trial court had acted on a show‑cause notice issued by the Corporation’s Designated Officer. The appellate court examined whether the trial court should consider the appellant’s material, determine the pending notice of motion, and hear an intervening landowner. It directed the trial court to decide the notice of motion within four weeks, to hear the intervenor, and to grant the appellant leave to file a rejoinder to the corporation’s affidavit. The court also ordered that no coercive steps be taken against the appellant’s structure for a week after any adverse final order, and disposed of the appeal without addressing the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether an appellate court can direct a trial court to determine a pending notice of motion and consider intervenor evidence notwithstanding an ad‑interim order.
- Whether a stay of coercive steps against the appellant’s property is appropriate pending final determination of the notice of motion.
Subjects
- appellate jurisdiction
- interim order
- stay of execution
- intervention
- notice of motion
- civil procedure
Judgment
16. AO-19-2026.odt
Amberkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 19 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 148 OF 2026
WITH
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 149 OF 2026
Abdul Sattar Bipat Khan .. Appellant
Versus
The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai
& Anr. .. Respondents
....................
Mr. Abhinav Chandrachud a/w Mr. Rajkumar Awasthi i/by Mr.
Manish Tomar, Advocates for Appellant
Mr. Sachin Vajale, Advocates for Respondents
Mr. Pradip Thorat a/w Mr. Aniesh Jadhav, Mr. Karan Gajra, Mr.
Avinash Bailmare a/w Mr. Shubham B.Choudhar i/by Mr. Nikhil
Adkine, Advocates for Intervener
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : JANUARY 17, 2026
P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Chandrachud, learned Advocate for Appellant; Mr.
Vajale, learned Advocate for Respondents - Corporation and Mr.
Thorat, learned Advocate for Intervener. It is mentioned at the time of
discharging the Board due to apprehension expressed by the
Appellant. Mr. Thorat has appeared after the order is dictated in
Court on behalf of the intervener - landowner. I have also heard him
on his objections.
1 of 3
16. AO-19-2026.odt
2. Challenge in the present Appeal from Order (AO) is to the ad-
interim order passed by the learned Trial Court pursuant to the
issuance of show-cause-notice and speaking order passed by the
Designated Officer of the Corporation. Suit proceeding has been filed.
It is prima facie seen that the material which is produced by Appellant
- Org. Plaintiff is required to be considered by the learned Trial Court
in accordance with law. Considering that impugned order is an ad-
interim order and Notice of Motion is pending final hearing, the
learned Trial Court is directed to determine the Notice of Motion and
pass appropriate reasoned speaking order after considering the case of
Plaintiff and Corporation. Learned Trial Court shall also hear the
landowner who has filed Chamber Summons seeking intervention in
the Suit while deciding the Notice of Motion. Learned Trial Court is
directed to decide the Notice of Motion as expeditiously as possible
and in any event within a period of four weeks from today. Leave to
file rejoinder is granted to the Plaintiff to the affidavit in reply of the
Corporation.
3. Learned Trial Court shall not be influenced by any of the
observations made in the impugned order and accordingly determine
the same.
4. In the meantime, no coercive steps shall be taken against the
structure of the Appellant and further for a period of one week after
2 of 3
16. AO-19-2026.odt
passing of the final order in the Notice of Motion if the said order is
adverse to the Plaintiff.
5. Without expressing any opinion on merits, present Appeal from
Order stands disposed of in the above terms. Both Interim
Applications are also disposed.
Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed
by RAVINDRA
RAVINDRA MOHAN
AMBERKAR
MOHAN Date:
AMBERKAR 2026.01.17
16:35:44
+0530
3 of 3
Checking your session…