Bombay High Court
Tonse Satish Upendra PaiversusReliance Industries Limited
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
- Bench
- MILIND N JADHAV
Holding
Since the applicant/petitioner is satisfied with the compliance by Respondent No. 1 Company and Respondent No. 2 IEPF, no further orders are necessary and the Interim Application is disposed of with liberty to apply in case of difficulty.
Summary
This order was passed in Interim Application No. 1741 of 2025 in Testamentary Petition No. 3923 of 2021. The applicant/petitioner is Tonse Satish Upendra Pai, and the respondents include Reliance Industries Ltd and the Investor Education and Protection Fund (IEPF). The court heard Mr. Vipul Shukla for Respondent No. 1 and Mr. Vinit Jain for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4; none appeared for the applicant. An affidavit in reply dated 30.01.2026 was filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 to 4, and a copy was handed over to Respondent No. 1. The court observed that the applicant/petitioner is satisfied with the compliance done by Respondent No. 1 Company and Respondent No. 2 IEPF. Accordingly, the court found that no further orders were necessary. Liberty was granted to the applicant/petitioner to apply in case of any difficulty, and the Interim Application was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether any further orders are necessary in the Interim Application in view of the compliance by Respondent No. 1 Company and Respondent No. 2 IEPF.
Subjects
- Testamentary and Intestate Jurisdiction
- Interim Application
- Compliance
- IEPF
- Reliance Industries Ltd
- Liberty to apply
- No further orders
Judgment
5. OS IA-1741-2025.odt
Amberkar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1741 OF 2025
IN
TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 3923 OF 2021
Tonse Satish Upendra Pai .. Applicant
Tonse Satish Upendra Pai .. Petitioner
Versus
Reliance Industries Ltd & Ors. .. Respondents
....................
Mr. Vipul Shukla, Advocate for Respondent No. 1
Mr. Vinit Jain a/w Mr. Gaurav Mhatre & Ms. Shazia Ansari,
Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4
...................
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 6, 2026
P. C.:
1. Heard Mr. Shukla, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 1 and
Mr. Jain, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 to 4. None for the
Applicant.
2. Mr. Jain has filed affidavit in reply dated 30.01.2026. Copy of
the same is already handed over to Mr. Shukla.
3. It appears that Applicant / Petitioner is satisfied with the
compliance done by Respondent No. 1 Company and Respondent No.
2 - IEPF. Hence no further orders are necessary to be passed.
4. Liberty to the Applicant / Petitioner to apply in case of any
difficulty.
1 of 2
5. OS IA-1741-2025.odt
5. Interim Application is disposed.
Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ]
Digitally signed
by RAVINDRA
RAVINDRA MOHAN
AMBERKAR
MOHAN Date:
AMBERKAR 2026.02.06
17:16:12
+0530
2 of 2
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.