Bombay High Court
SHYAM SUNDER S.VARSHNEYversusMHADA AND 3 ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court permitted the applicant to file the additional affidavit within two weeks.
Summary
In an interim application filed by Shyam Sunder S. Varshney against MHADA and others, the Court was asked to allow the applicant to bring on record an order dated 7 December 2006 passed in S.C. Suit No. 2732 of 2002 by filing an additional affidavit. The Court examined the procedural propriety of permitting such a filing at the interim stage. It held that the applicant may be permitted to file the additional affidavit, subject to a two‑week deadline. Consequently, the application was disposed of with the order granting permission. No substantive merits of the main writ petition were addressed.
Issues considered
- Whether the applicant should be permitted to file an additional affidavit to bring on record the order dated 7 December 2006 in the pending proceedings
Subjects
- interim application
- additional affidavit
- civil procedure
- order to produce documents
- disposal of application
Judgment
11-ia 214-23.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 214 OF 2023
IN
WRIT PETITION NO. 2013 OF 2022
Shyam Sunder S. Varshney … Applicant
Versus
MHADA & Ors. ... Respondents
__________________________
Mr. Mitesh Varshney for the Applicant.
Smt. Poonam Mittal, AGP for the Respondent-State.
Ms. Anjali Ghuge for Respondent No.3-BMC.
Mr. P. G. Lad a/w. Ms. Sayali Apte for Respondent No.1-MHADA.
__________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
DATED : 24th MARCH, 2026.
P.C. :
1. The applicant is permitted to bring on record the Order dated 7 th
December, 2006 passed in S. C. Suit No. 2732 of 2002 by way of an
Additional Affidavit. The same be done within a period of two weeks from
today.
2. The application is disposed of.
(SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Amk 1/1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.