Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

FRANKLIN WADCORPP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDCIT CIRCLE 1 3 2 MUMBAI

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court allowed the condonation of the 80‑day delay in filing the appeal.

Summary

M/s Franklin Wadcorpp India Pvt. Ltd. filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 but delayed filing by 80 days. The appellant sought condonation of this delay through an interim application. The Court examined the averments and found a sufficient case for condonation. In the interest of justice, the Court allowed the application, granting condonation of the delay. The Court further directed that any office objections be removed within four weeks, otherwise the appeal would be dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a delay of 80 days in filing an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 can be condoned.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Income Tax
  • Section 260A
  • condonation of delay
  • appeal procedure
  • civil procedure

Judgment

                                                                                               10 IA 2352-24.DOC




LAXMI
                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SUBHASH
SONTAKKE                             ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
LAXMI SUBHASH
SONTAKKE
Date: 2026.04.16
16:34:54 +0530
                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2352 OF 2024
                                                       IN
                                      INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 10787 OF 2024
                                                      AND
                                     INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 10713 OF 2026
                                                       IN
                                      INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 10788 OF 2024


                      M/s. Franklin Wadcorpp India Pvt. Ltd.                                  ...Appellant
                            Versus
                      National Faceless Assessment Centre & Ors.                      ...Respondent
                                                          _______
                      Mr. Rahul Hakani for the Applicant.
                      None for the Respondents
                                                             _______

                                                          CORAM:        G. S. KULKARNI &
                                                                        AARTI SATHE, JJ.

                                                          DATE:         10 APRIL 2026

                      P.C.

                      1.         We have heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.


                      2.         By this Interim Application, the Applicant has prayed for condonation

                      of delay of 80 days caused in filing the aforesaid appeal under the provisions of

                      Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.


                      3.         We have perused the averments as made in the Application, which

                      make out a sufficient case for the delay to be condoned.


                      4.         In the aforesaid circumstances, it is in the interest of justice that the

                      Application is allowed. It is accordingly allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).


                                                         Page 1 of 2
                      Laxmi
                                                                       10 IA 2352-24.DOC



5.           Office objections, if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from

today, failing which the appeal shall stand dismissed without further reference to

the Court.




        (AARTI SATHE, J.)                        (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)




                                   Page 2 of 2
Laxmi


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.