Created by Fuzzy Cloud

G S KULKARNI

70 judgments · newest first · showing 1–70

SACHIN GORAKSHANATH KOKANEversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, a Junior College Teacher appointed by a private college, sought a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the Deputy Director of Education to decide a proposal dated 27 November 2025 for his transfer from a non‑aided to a fully‑aided establishment. The petitioner argued that the …

RENUKA RAMCHANDRA GHONGE AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, ten BAMS doctors appointed on contractual basis to Group‑A and Group‑B medical officer posts in rural PHCs of Nashik, sought regularisation of their services under Article 226 of the Constitution, invoking a 1981 government resolution reserving 33% of PHC posts for BAMS doctors. The …

VILAS DAYARAM PATILversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

Vilas Dayaram Patil filed a writ petition seeking multiple reliefs, including quashing an order dated 8 June 2026, mandamus for appointment as Supervisor (Education), and stays on the said order. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the petition while …

RAJESH VASANT KINIversusTHE EDUCATION OFFICER (SECONDARY) AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Rajesh Vasant Kini, an assistant teacher at Anant Janardhan Vartak Junior College, challenged two seniority lists dated 18 November 2024 and 6 November 2025, alleging they were prepared in violation of Rule 12 of the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) …

SWAPNA PANDIT THAKURversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Swapna Pandit Thakur, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. Counsel for the petitioner argued that the matter should be heard before the Division Bench at Aurangabad and therefore requested permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh …

RAM DASHRATH KOREversusCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLHA PARISHAD THANE AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioner, Ram Dashrath Kore, filed a writ petition (No. 403 of 2023) before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad Thane, and six others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner at the hearing, nor had any representation been made …

ASHOK TOTARAM MARSALEversusUNION OF INDIA THR ITS MINISTRY OF RAILWAY AND ORS

Rejected

The petitioner, Ashok Totaram Marsale, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking quashing of orders that denied him family pension and directing the respondents to pay pension per the Railway Pension Manual, 1993. The respondents contended that the petition was not maintainable and that the …

RAJESHWARI SRINIVASversusSRI VANI VIDYASHALA HIGH SCHOOL THR HEADMASTER AND ORS

Disposed Off

Smt. Rajeswari Srinivas, a retired full‑time assistant teacher, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus directing the Education Officer (Secondary), Zilla Parishad, Thane (Respondent No.3) to approve her pending proposals for continuation of service (dated 19 Nov 2015) and pension …

ASHA MADHUKAR SHEWALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Asha Madhukar Shewale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court accepted this submission and disposed of the petition on the ground that it was no longer …

SANJAY RAMCHANDRA TANDELversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition and a related civil application in the High Court of Bombay. Over time, the petitioner lost interest in pursuing the matter. The Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and, due to the lapse of time, dismissed it for want of prosecution. …

SHAKILA KADIR PATHANversusREGIONAL CASTE VERIFICATION COMMITTEE AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 5536 of 2007) and a related civil application (No. 1408 of 2009) challenging the actions of the Regional Caste Verification Committee, Pune Division. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented for an extended period, and the petitioner indicated a …

PRANALI JAYANT SAWANTversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA TRROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY

Disposed Off

The petitioners, who are state government employees posted with District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commissions, filed a writ petition challenging a government resolution and a transfer order issued by the State Government. The petition was initially dismissed for want of prosecution, but was later …

KALYANI PANDHARINATH LOHHAKAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE GP AND ANR

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Kalyani Pandharinath Lohakare, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking to quash a condition requiring submission of a bank statement and to compel the Nashik Municipal Corporation to consider cash vouchers as proof of experience. The corporation responded with a communication …

JAYA RAJESH SINGH AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU SECRETARY AND ORS

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard two related writ petitions challenging the termination of Sunita Chandramauli Singh and the appointment of Jaya Rajesh Singh as Head Mistress of a school. Both petitioners and respondents agreed to dispose of the matters as per the minutes of order. The Court did not …

UDDHAV MOHAN KHOMNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GOVT. PLEADER

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Uddhav Mohan Khomne, filed a writ petition and later sought leave to withdraw the petition while retaining the liberty to file a fresh petition. The High Court allowed the withdrawal as prayed for, expressly keeping all contentions of the parties open for future reference. The …

SHITALANATH PRAKASH KASTURE AND ORSversusPREMILA SAMBHAJI KHADE AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners later applied for leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave and ordered the petition to be withdrawn. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without any costs. The related …

ADJ UTILITY APPS PVT LTDversusUNION OF INDA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Adj Utility APPS Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the denial of adjustment of excess IGST paid inadvertently against ineligible input tax credit, alleging that the department’s reliance on the time‑limit under Section 37(3) of the CGST Act was ultra‑vires. The petitioner …

MR. GAJANAN NAMDEO OGE AND ORSversusVASAI-VIRAR CITY MUNICIPAL CORP. AND ORS

Disposed Off

Vilas Kamlakar Patil filed a writ petition against the Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation (VVCMC) and later moved an interim application (No. 3135 of 2026). The respondents sought relief, and the matter was heard by a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the Court was …

Foodlink F and B Holdings IndiaversusThe Union of India

Disposed Off

Foodlink F&B Holdings filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the constitutionality of Section 83 of the CGST Act and eight provisional bank‑attachment orders dated 27‑02‑2024. The High Court earlier ordered a special audit under Section 66 of the CGST Act, which was completed and a …

FOODLINK F AND B HOLDINGS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS

Disposed Off

Foodlink F&B Holdings filed a writ petition under Article 226 challenging the constitutionality of Section 83 of the CGST Act and seeking to quash eight attachment orders dated 27‑02‑2024 that froze 36 of its bank accounts. The High Court earlier ordered a special audit under Section 66 of the CGST …

RAHUL KUMARversusSTATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

Dismissed

Rahul Kumar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of State Bank of India and others. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the petition was not pursued further. The court noted the petitioner's non‑prosecution of the matter. Consequently, the bench …

TUSHAR BHARAT AHIREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The petitioners, Avinash and Tushar Ahire, challenged the May 4, 2019 order of the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee that invalidated their claim of belonging to the Thakur Scheduled Tribe, which affected Avinash's appointment as a Sales Tax Inspector on a reserved post. They submitted …

I HEART PROPERTIES PVT LTDversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Disposed Off

The petitioner, I Heart Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging an order of the State Tax Officer, Raigad Division, Navi Mumbai. The State Tax Officer subsequently withdrew the impugned order, and communicated this withdrawal to the petitioner on 27 January 2026. The petitioner then …

SHIV CHHATRAPATI SRA CHS LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Disposed Off

The petitioners, a slum rehabilitation cooperative, sought mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and the Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) to redevelop specific lands and pay transit rent owed since 2015. The Court noted the grievance stemmed from the developer's termination and non‑payment …

SHRI NAMDEO V. SANASversusTHE INDIAN HOTELS COMPANY LIMITED AND OTHER

Disposed Off

The Bombay High Court heard four Letters Patent Appeals arising from two writ petitions filed in 1996 between The Indian Hotels Company Limited and Namdev V. Sanas & Others. Two appeals were filed by the hotel company and two by the respondents. The parties presented a settlement agreement, signed …

AMBARNATH SAH.SAMUDAIK SHETKI SOC.LTD.AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAH. AND ORS.

Disposed Off

The High Court heard a letters patent appeal (No.10 of 2011) filed by Ambarnath Sahakari Samudaik Shetki Society Limited and others against the State of Maharashtra. During the hearing, counsel for the State pointed out an error in paragraph 20 of the Court's earlier judgment, specifically the …

SATISH BHUJANGA SHETTY AND ORSversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. G. P. AND ORS

Dismissed

The petitioners, Satish Bhujanga Shetty and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.4, a private landlord, to remove a lock and allow repair work on a building terrace, along with various ancillary orders. The same reliefs had previously been sought …