Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHIVAJI RAMA PAWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is disposed of, but the petitioner is entitled to challenge his categorisation through appropriate proceedings.

Summary

Shivaji Rama Pawar filed a criminal writ petition challenging his categorisation by the Maharashtra Home Department under Category 4(e) of the 15th March 2010 Guidelines, which mandates a sentence of 26 years including remissions. The Respondent State, through Mrs. P. P. Shinde, argued that the categorisation was proper and that the petition had no remaining relief. The Court observed that, in view of the categorisation, the prayers in the petition could not be entertained and ordered its disposal. However, the Court clarified that the petitioner retains the right to contest the categorisation through appropriate legal proceedings. Consequently, both the writ petition and the interim application filed therein were disposed of. The judgment underscores the procedural avenue available to challenge prison categorisation under the Guidelines.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is liable to undergo a sentence of 26 years as per Category 4(e) of the 2010 Guidelines
  • Whether the writ petition seeking relief against the categorisation can be entertained

Subjects

  • criminal law
  • prison categorisation
  • sentence guidelines
  • interim application
  • writ petition
  • procedural rights

Judgment

           Digitally
           signed by
           HEMANT
HEMANT     CHANDERSEN   H.C. SHIV                                                   43.w3422.23.doc
CHANDERSEN SHIV
SHIV       Date:
           2026.01.20
           17:05:33
           +0300                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                          CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.3422 OF 2023
                                                        IN
                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2352 OF 2025

                   Shivaji Rama Pawar                               …..Petitioner/Applicant
                         Vs.
                   The State of Maharashtra                         …..Respondent

                                     __________________________________________

                   None for the Petitioner/Applicant.
                   Mrs. P. P. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
                                  __________________________________________

                                                       CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                    SHYAM C. CHANDAK, JJ.
                                                          DATE :    8th JANUARY, 2026.


                   P.C.:-

                   1)               Learned APP, on instructions from Senior Jailor, Nashik Road

                   Central Prison, Nashik submitted that the Home Department, Government

                   of Maharashtra has categorised the Petitioner and placed him in category

                   4(e) of 15th March 2010 Guidelines, issued by the Government of

                   Maharashtra. As per the said guidelines, the Petitioner will have to undergo

                   sentence of 26 years including remissions.

                   1.1)             In view of the above, the prayers in the Petition are worked out

                   and nothing further survives in the Petition at this stage.

                   2)               Petition is accordingly disposed off.

                   3)               However it is made clear that, the Petitioner is entitled to

                                                                                                      1/2
     H.C. SHIV                                                43.w3422.23.doc

challenge his categorisation to undergo sentence of 26 years, by adopting

appropriate proceedings.

4)               In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, Interim Application

No.2352 of 2025 filed therein does not survive and is accordingly disposed

off.



          (SHYAM C. CHANDAK, J.)                    (A.S. GADKARI, J.)




                                                                                2/2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.