Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
559 judgments · newest first · showing 1–200
The petitioner, Chandan Prabhakar Bhagat, filed a writ petition seeking compensation from the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that, following a statement recorded on 30 April 2026, the Government had paid Rs. 1,00,000 as compensation, which was transferred to the …
The petitioner, Moonirahmed Mohmmadshirin Pathan, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the filing, the petitioner and his counsel failed to appear for hearings and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 31 January 2020. The court noted the petitioner’s lack of …
A writ petition was filed on 20 December 2019 by Smita Ratan Chinoy and another petitioner seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted that the …
The petitioner, Paramita Deshmukh Dhole, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 16 December 2019. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal …
The Indian Motion Pictures’ Producers’ Association filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a direction for the lodging of a criminal complaint. The petition relied on a complaint filed by the petitioner. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Sujal …
The petitioners, Hanumant Mohan Shelke & Ors., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. They later sought leave to withdraw the petition and requested liberty to file applications for discharge before the trial court. The Court examined its authority to …
The petitioner, Suraj Arkit Rawal, filed a writ petition on 14 January 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel for the hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that the …
The petitioner, Marry Ghanshyam Kodate, filed a writ petition on 20 January 2020 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
Illusion Cafe filed Writ Petition No. 467 of 2020 in the Bombay High Court challenging certain actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel, later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court examined whether a petitioner may be allowed to withdraw a writ …
The petitioners filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. After March 17, 2020, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The Court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Bharati Damodar Chaudhari, filed a writ petition on 22 January 2020 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 24 January 2020 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
This was a writ petition filed in the Bombay High Court's Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction by Kashinath Dnyanu Karande against the State of Maharashtra and others. When the matter was called for hearing, no one appeared for the petitioner. The Court noted from the record that since the petition was …
The petitioners, Jayesh Gangji Shah & Ors., filed a writ petition on 1st February 2020 in the High Court of Bombay. No petitioners appeared when called for hearing, and the record shows they made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioners appeared …
The petitioner, Pratibha Sambhaji Shinde, filed a writ petition on 3 February 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No steps were taken by the petitioner or her counsel to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the …
The petitioner, Nisheet Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on his complaint. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of …
The petitioner, Soni Prasad, filed a writ petition on 7 February 2020 in the Bombay High Court. No hearing attendance or any steps to circulate the petition were taken by the petitioner or her counsel since filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Hitesh Bhaverlalji Jain, was acquitted by a magistrate on 16 August 2018 because the prosecution failed to prove the charges against him. The magistrate's judgment did not record any finding that the petitioner was falsely implicated in the alleged crime. The petitioner filed a writ …
D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd filed a writ petition (No. 893 of 2020) in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. The court noted that after 28 February 2020, neither the petitioner nor its counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The record showed …
Petitioners Zaibunnisha Badshah Shaikh & Anr. sought relief from the High Court but the Court was not inclined to grant any. They requested permission to withdraw the writ petition and to approach the State Police Complaints Authority under Section 22P of the Maharashtra Police Act, subject to the …
A writ petition was filed on 14 February 2020 by Rahul Uttam Galande seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the …
Petitioner Rakhi Mihir Bhansali filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and others. The petitioner, through counsel, later requested unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The Court considered the request and, exercising its inherent powers, …
The petitioner, Awdhesh Kumar Mishra, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 18 February 2020. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any of the scheduled hearings. The court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition after filing. It …
Rajesh Waman Shravane and others filed a civil writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and others, seeking relief concerning a pending revision petition. The petitioners alleged grievance over the delay in deciding the revision petition. The learned Additional …
Petitioners C.R. Unnikrishnan & Anr. applied to the Bombay High Court seeking unconditional leave to withdraw their writ petition, claiming it had become infructuous. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Sebin Michael Joseph. The respondents, the Union of India and others, were represented by Mr. …
Petitioners C.R. Unnikrishnan & Anr. applied to the Bombay High Court seeking unconditional leave to withdraw their writ petition, claiming it had become infructuous. The petitioners were represented by Mr. Sebin Michael Joseph. The respondents, the Union of India and others, were represented by Mr. …
The petitioner, Vipul Kakubhai Kamdar, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner during the hearing. The Court dismissed the petition on the ground of non-prosecution.
Petitioner Vinayak Vijaysingh Chauhan filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the proceedings against him. He sought relief on the ground that the investigation was pending. The court observed that the police had completed the investigation and had already filed a …
The petitioners, Indrani Bal Tausalkar and another, filed a writ petition on 11 October 2019 challenging the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner appeared for hearing, and the record shows they made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in …
A writ petition was filed on 16 October 2019 by Santosh Anand Chavan seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Sachin Sudam Pardeshi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the continuation of criminal proceedings. The petition was filed in the context of C.R. No. 1264 of 2019 registered at Chakan Police Station, Pune. The police, represented by PSI Morkhande, submitted …
The petitioners, Bharat Mavji Chheda and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 16 January 2020. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
A writ petition was filed by Mohammed Muzammil before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 13 March 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Prabhakar Dnyanoba Kutwal, failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after November 7, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered the lack of prosecution as …
Jayeshkumar N. Kamli filed a writ petition on 3 December 2019 challenging the actions of the UT Administration of Daman & Diu. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
A writ petition was filed on 28 November 2019 by Vijay Shrirang Babar seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Aloke Ganesh Chatterjee, filed a writ petition on 6 December 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner when called for hearing. The court record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 December 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No …
The petitioner, Tushar Khanderao Khande, filed a writ petition on 7 December 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner and his counsel never appeared for any hearing after filing. The record shows that no steps were taken to circulate the petition at any time. The court observed that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 December 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Bhushan Pankaj Valia, filed a writ petition seeking relief against the Union of India and others. On instructions, the petitioner’s counsel requested unconditional withdrawal of the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw the petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of …
The petitioners filed a writ petition seeking directions to the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to investigate alleged offences based on their complaint. The petition raised the question of its maintainability in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar v. State of …
Amit Mahendra Ruparel filed Writ Petition Nos. 5707 and 5708 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Kapil Dave, later sought unconditional leave to withdraw both petitions. The respondents, represented by Mr. Shrikant V. …
Petitioner Praveen filed a writ petition seeking the lodging of a crime based on a complaint dated 16 October 2018. The petition was examined in light of the Supreme Court's decision in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra (2026 SCC OnLine SC 798). The Court held that, following the …
The petitioner, Gulabrao Kisan Lokhande, filed a writ petition challenging a mutation entry (No.4756) but later sought to withdraw the petition, citing an alternate statutory remedy under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The petitioner’s counsel requested leave to withdraw with liberty to …
The petitioner, accused No.5 Rajendra R. Chaturvedi, filed a writ petition challenging a Metropolitan Magistrate's order dated 30 January 2013 that refused to accept a ‘B‑Summary Report’ filed by the State CID and to discharge certain accused under Section 169 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973. …
The petitioner, Charushila Rajasiha Kanambelle, filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner sought a stay of the proceedings, and an application for stay was filed on 29 May 2026 before the Revenue Minister. The learned Additional Government Pleader, on …
The petitioner, Amit Turakhia, filed an interim application seeking restoration of his writ petition (No.2732 of 2019) which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 17 June 2026. The petitioner argued that the dismissal was premature and that he had a valid ground to continue the proceedings. The …
The petitioner, Ashok Aatmaram Deshmukh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 27 July 2026, as well as on a prior date of 6 July 2026. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the petition. No substantive …
The petitioners, Bhagtani Riyo Welfare Association & Ors, failed to appear before the High Court on two consecutive dates, 6 July 2026 and 27 July 2026. The court noted that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the writ petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition on the …
The petitioners filed a criminal writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested the court's permission to withdraw, which was granted by the bench. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. In view of the …
The petition was filed by accused Rajendra R. Chaturvedi seeking acceptance of a ‘B‑Summary Report’ filed by the State CID, which concluded that the informant’s complaint was false and recommended dropping the proceedings. The Metropolitan Magistrate had rejected the CID’s request to discharge the …
A writ petition (No. 4700 of 2019) was filed by Amiya Kumar Gaurishanker Jha before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing on 27 July 2026, and had also not appeared on an earlier date of 6 July 2026. The court observed that the petitioner seemed uninterested in …
The petitioner, Dharmesh Thakkar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The parties subsequently settled their disputes and the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted the request for withdrawal. The Court examined …
The petitioner, Ashfaq Arif Palwala, filed a writ petition but repeatedly failed to give instructions to proceed, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case. Counsel for the petitioner informed the court of this inability to assist in adjudication. The court noted the petitioner's …
The applicant, Kalim Rauf Sayyed, sought condonation of a 264‑day delay in filing an appeal under Section 12 of the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999, against a Special Judge's order dated 4 April 2024. The respondent, the State of Maharashtra, opposed the condonation, arguing that no …
Nandjyot Properties & Hotels Private Limited filed a writ petition challenging the non‑communication of a Revenue Department order dated 1 August 2024 concerning R.T.S. Application No.3424 of 2024. The petitioner sought a direction for the Secretary to allow inspection of the file to verify whether …
Mantram Welfare LLP filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 4 April 2024 issued by the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief against the said order. Respondents, through the Additional Tehsildar of Panvel, produced a photocopy of a subsequent order dated 10 July 2026 wherein the …
The petitioner, Nitin Yedaba Gaikwad, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay challenging an order of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed after the petitioner had been released from jail in 2019, having served his entire sentence. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 22 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No petitioner appeared for hearing and their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the …
The petitioner, Rakshan Narayann Joshi, filed a writ petition on 23 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
Sudhir Vishram Birje filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 5, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the …
The petitioner, Jinesh Kantilal Malde, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing date of 16 December 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The court observed that the …
The petitioner, Abdul Rahim Allauddin Gori, filed a writ petition on 19 December 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed …
The petitioner, Bhanubhai Purshottambhai Varia, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No representative appeared for the petitioner at the hearing. The court noted that since 9 February 2022, neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to advance the petition. It was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 18 July 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
The Igatpuri Peoples Education & Welfare Society filed a writ petition on 9 August 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
The petitioner, Ivan Cyril D’Souza, filed a writ petition challenging the investigation in a criminal matter. The police, after completing their investigation, filed an A‑Summary Report before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No.8, Thane on 9 March 2023. The Respondent State, through its …
The petitioner, Purshottam Sharma, filed a writ petition (No. 4741 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court challenging an action by the Union of India and others. The petition was argued by Mr. Dhyey Bhavsar on behalf of the petitioner, while the respondents were represented by Mr. S.V. Gavand. The Court …
The petitioner, Vinod Kishore Vaishnav, filed writ petitions (Nos. 1047 of 2018, 1589 of 2020, 754 of 2022) challenging his detention. The State, through its APP, submitted that the petitioner had been released on 11 June 2026 after completing his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioner, Vinod Kishore Vaishnav, filed writ petitions (Nos. 1047 of 2018, 1589 of 2020, 754 of 2022) challenging his detention. The State, through its APP, submitted that the petitioner had been released on 11 June 2026 after completing his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioner, Vinod Kishore Vaishnav, filed writ petitions (Nos. 1047 of 2018, 1589 of 2020, 754 of 2022) challenging his detention. The State, through its APP, submitted that the petitioner had been released on 11 June 2026 after completing his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioner, Rakesh Ashok Kanjani, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file an application before the trial court under Section 216 or Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code, after the police filed a supplementary charge‑sheet against a …
Petitioners Subhash Bhimrao Bhopi & Anr filed multiple writ petitions challenging actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had already decided the petitioners' complaint, rendering the grievance moot. Petitioners, through counsel, sought …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 5 July 2021 but failed to appear for any hearing and took no steps to advance the case. The petition was last listed on 9 April 2026, when the petitioner’s counsel sought an adjournment citing personal difficulty. The court observed that the petitioner showed …
Petitioners Subhash Bhimrao Bhopi & Anr filed multiple writ petitions challenging actions of the Union of India and other respondents. The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) had already decided the petitioners' complaint, rendering the grievance moot. Petitioners, through counsel, sought …
The petitioner, Chhaya Mukund Deshmuku, filed a writ petition challenging the actions of the Superintendent of Land Records. The Deputy Superintendent of Land Records, Taluka Sinnar, issued an order on the petitioner's application dated 24 June 2026. The court examined the order and concluded that …
The petitioners, Saraswati and others, filed a writ petition challenging the filing of a B‑Summary Report (CR No.176 of 2016) by the police before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Vadgaon, Maval on 26 September 2018. The respondent State, through its Assistant Public Prosecutor, submitted an …
Mr. Rameshchandra Punja Shah filed a writ petition (No. 1456 of 2015) in the Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner was represented by Mr. Abhijeet Naik, assisted by Mr. Rajesh Khobragade. The respondents were represented …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 16 August 2019 but never appeared before the court and made no effort to advance the petition. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor her counsel circulated the petition at any time. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Noaman Musa Kharodia, filed a writ petition on 21 September 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner at the hearing, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 October 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing on 25 June 2026. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor her counsel had taken any steps to advance the petition since its filing. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
This order was passed in Writ Petition No.5298 of 2019 filed by Shirish Chintamani Karnik against the State of Maharashtra and others, along with Interim Application (ST) No.9932 of 2025 filed by D.S. Kulkarni Developers Ltd. When the matter was called for hearing, no one appeared for the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 September 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when called for hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 28 November 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and made no effort to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner’s lack of interest in pursuing the matter. On the basis of this non‑prosecution, the judges held that the petition could not …
The petitioner, M/s. Oriental Enterprise, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 27 February 2020, neither the petitioner nor its counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not …
M/s. Lakshachandi Housing and Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the State of Maharashtra concerning the pending C‑Summary Report in criminal case No. 214 of 2017, originally registered at Santacruz Police Station and later investigated by the Economic Offences Wing (Housing …
The petitioner, Naren Avinash Joshi, filed a writ petition on 7 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared disinterested in pursuing …
M/s. Royal Chains Private Ltd. filed a writ petition seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through senior counsel, applied for leave to withdraw the petition and to pursue an alternative remedy under the Land Revenue Code before the appropriate authority. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 June 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and made no effort to advance the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No …
The petitioner, Sachin Shantaram Sonavane, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. Subsequently, the petitioner applied for leave to withdraw the petition, stating that the cause of action no longer survived. The court considered whether it could grant leave to withdraw a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 11 July 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and took no steps to circulate the petition. The court noted the petitioner’s apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive arguments …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 23 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No steps were taken by the petitioners or their counsel to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing …
The petitioner, Dashrath Kallappa Bhosale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Abhilasha Pawar appearing through Mr. Vivek Arote, requested the court’s permission for the withdrawal. The court considered …
The petitioner, Shabbir @ Vali Dawood Khan, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court's Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 24 January 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the …
Neves Agusta D'souza filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not circulate the petition after 31 July 2019. The record indicated that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition thereafter, suggesting a lack of …
The petition was filed on 16 July 2019 by Vranda Gokuldas Pai and others. No petitioner appeared for hearing and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 July 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and took no steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges noted the lack of prosecution of the petition. The petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Girish Ramdas Nayak, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 17 December 2021, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
Padmini Likhar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an unspecified order of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 19 November 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the …
The petitioner, Ramachandran Vadivel Moopanar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Adv. Sathyanarayanan, made the application. The Court, after considering the request, granted leave to withdraw the …
The petitioner, Romaster Mulji Discretionary Trust, filed a writ petition on 2 August 2019 seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No further action was taken by the petitioner or its counsel to advance the petition, including any attempt to circulate it. The court noted the petitioner’s …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 August 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could continue. …
The petitioner, Dr. Arun Natthujee Khodskar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The petitioner, Dipti Saroj Kale, filed a writ petition on 19 August 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petition was scheduled for hearing but the petitioner failed to appear when called. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since …
The petition was filed by Pride Universal Private Limited on 22 August 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Harshad Dhaneshlal Patel, filed a writ petition on 27 August 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that …
The petitioner, IGL Finance Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Directorate of Enforcement and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel requested unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
Manish Kisan Mazgaonkar filed a writ petition on 17 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioners, Dnyaneshwar Narayan Doke and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 11 February 2019. The High Court examined the maintainability of such a petition in light of the Supreme Court’s recent …
Chandrahas filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petition could be entertained despite the passage of time. It held that the cause of action had become extinct due to the efflux of time. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Union of India and others. During the proceedings, the petitioners, through their counsel, requested unconditional leave to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous. The Court granted leave to …
Vilas Suryakant Mayekar filed a writ petition on 19 December 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record showed that neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court …
Petitioner Suresh Kumar Balkrishna Modi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the cause of action no longer existed, rendering the petition infructuous. The Court examined the submission and found no remaining basis to …
The petitioner, Kalamuddin Usman Shaikh, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after June 19, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The petitioner, Rohit Prem Chhabra, filed a writ petition on 7 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that …
The petitioner, Manisha Uttam Kunde, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after 17 March 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
Ikhlak Ismail Modak filed Writ Petition No. 105 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 3 March 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court …
Madhuri Pritam Choudhari filed Writ Petition No. 130 of 2019 on 8 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested …
The petitioner, Nandeepak Dayal Patade, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after June 11, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …
A writ petition (No. 141 of 2019) was filed by Aasma Mohammed Farooq & Anr. before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 4 February 2019, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 9 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. No substantive …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. It appears …
The petitioner, Noaman Kharodia, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. After the police filed a charge‑sheet, the petitioner contended that the petition had become infructuous and sought unconditional leave to withdraw it. The Court granted the petitioner's request for leave to withdraw …
The petitioner, Rajendrakumar Vishwanath Trivedi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel circulated the petition after May …
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after March 4, 2019, neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 18 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. Since filing, neither the petitioners nor their counsel appeared for any hearing or took steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared disinterested in pursuing the matter. …
Baig Salim Abdul Razzak filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention. The State of Maharashtra, through its Additional Public Prosecutor, informed the Court that the petitioner had already been released after serving his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could be dismissed …
The petitioners failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after June 17, 2019. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Amjad Mohammad Harun Ansari filed Writ Petition No. 494 of 2019 before the Bombay High Court on 29 January 2019 against the Commissioner of Police, Thane City and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court …
The petitioner, Lalita Santosh Chawariya, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after June 17, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Deepa Trivedi, filed a writ petition on 17 December 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at any hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 26 December 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when called for hearing, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that …
Petitioner Balu Mukka Khair filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after 25 March 2019. The court observed that the …
Aishwarya Yogesh Joshi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 14 January 2019 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court …
Aparna Chandrakant Karve filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. As a …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested …
Amol filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Inspector General and others. The petitioner was on furlough leave from Yerwada Open District Prison when he died on 16 November 2024, as reported by the jailor. The respondent State, through its counsel, submitted that …
The petitioner, Seema Shashikant Kalel, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after February 13, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. …
The petitioner, Amit Yogesh Sampat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking the return of his passport. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition and instead file an application before the Sessions Court for the same relief. The Court considered …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 638 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. After February 20, 2019, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared …
The petitioner, Jiendra Motwani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after July 1, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court …
The petition was filed on 5 February 2019 by SRT Engineering Company Pvt. Ltd. seeking relief, but the petitioner and its counsel made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Uday Kumar Singh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court of the death. The Court considered whether the petition could continue after the death of the …
Ashok Purushottam Bachuwar filed a writ petition on 12 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
Petitioner Kajal Manoj Misra filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal before the …
The petitioner, Irfan Hussain Ilfat Hussain Shaikh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 31, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 February 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Chetak Manohar Sheth, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 30 March 2022. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioners, Sachin Audumber Toraskar & Ors., filed Writ Petition No. 926 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 18, 2019, neither they nor their counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The Court noted the petitioners' apparent lack of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Sunita Vilas Gaonkar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 22 August 2018. The High Court considered the recent Supreme Court judgment in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. State of Maharashtra …
The petitioner, Mohd. Masood Alam, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after March 19, 2019. The court …
The petitioner, Amar Bama Mhatre, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 9, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The petitioner, Samina Shaikh, filed a writ petition on 22 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner at the hearing, and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor her advocate took any steps to advance the petition since its filing. The court observed that …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The issue before the court was whether the …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No. 1038 of 2019 on 22 February 2019 seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. They failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record shows that from the filing date, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the …
The petitioners, Tarmat Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel informed the court that the cause of action for the petition no longer existed. The court accepted this submission and held that the petition had become infructuous. …
Petitioner Seema Nitin Kalgutkar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief. The petitioner, through counsel, later applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court considered whether such a withdrawal could be permitted under procedural law. The judges granted …
The petitioner, Rambhavu Nana Pathare, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after June 19, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The respondent State, represented by counsel, highlighted the petitioner's inaction. The Court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 11 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court inferred that the petitioner was not …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after April 24, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to take any steps to circulate the petition after 9 April 2019. The court noted that neither the petitioners nor their counsel pursued the matter further. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in …
Plaza Hotels Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition on 11 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No steps were taken by the petitioner or its counsel to advance the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. Consequently, …
Petitioner Vilas Suryakant Mayekar filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019. The petitioner was absent when called for hearing on 17 June 2026 and had not taken any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's absence and lack of any action to advance the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges held that the petition could not be …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 but failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No …
The petitioner, Vilas Suryakant Mayekar, filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The respondent State of Maharashtra, represented by Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 8 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear at the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 13 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing, and the record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition at any …
The petitioner, Nazeer, filed a writ petition on 13 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or …
The petitioners, Members of Golden Isle CHS Ltd., filed a writ petition on 28 February 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No petitioner or counsel appeared when the matter was called for hearing. The court noted that since filing, the petitioners made no effort to circulate the petition or pursue the …
The petitioner, Deepak Ganpat Devrukhhar, filed a writ petition on 13 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing dated 17 June 2026. The court noted that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate the petition. It …
The petitioner, Nalini Ashok Panchal, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither she nor her counsel circulated the petition after March 25, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Dr. Pranjali Omkar Jadhav, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after July 2, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. …
The petitioner, Salma Wahidulla Khan, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 20 March 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
A writ petition (No. 1472 of 2019) was filed by Vijendra Kumar Rai against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that after 10 April 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court …
The petitioner, Aliya Mojib Pinjari, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing when called. The court record shows that after 15 October 2025, neither the petitioner nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It appears the …
The petitioner, Sonali Arvind Nadkarni, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. She failed to appear for the hearing and, after June 19, 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Rakesh Gupta filed Writ Petition No. 1504 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the Union of India and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 3 April 2019, indicating a lack of …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 20 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to circulate the petition after filing. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 17 June 2026. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. No …
The petitioner, Prem C. Somani, filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 17 January 2025. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition …
Manish H. Milani filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after March 25, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Mohan Nagu Kunchikorve, filed writ petition No.1628 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 2 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Chandan Chittaranjan Sharma, filed a writ petition on 27 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Amol @ Avikumar Dhondiram Dhule, filed a writ petition on 28 March 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when called for hearing. The court noted that since the filing date, neither the petitioner nor his advocate has taken any …
Parwana Amardeep Co‑Operative Housing Society Ltd. filed a writ petition, but after 10 April 2019 neither the petitioner nor its counsel appeared or took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Mohammed Raza Khan, filed a writ petition on 26 March 2016 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. …
