Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
559 judgments · newest first · showing 201–400
The petitioners filed a contempt petition in the High Court of Bombay. While a revision application was pending before the competent authority, the petitioners sought leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No …
The petitioner, Glynis M. Sequeira, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after 23 July 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 April 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution.
The petitioner, Purshottam Bhaskar Mhatre, filed a writ petition on 4 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court observed that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 12 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court held that …
The petitioner, Mohammed Nihal Mohd. Maqsood, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 13 October 2023. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, …
Gajanan Rajaram Nagarkar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 18 April 2019 against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition remained inactive as the petitioner and his counsel made no attempts to circulate or advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition but failed to appear for the hearing and, after April 26, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Mahesh Kissan Motewar, Director of Samruddha Jeevan Multi State Multi Purpose Cooperative Society, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. After filing, the petitioner and his counsel failed to circulate the petition or take any further steps after 9 July 2019. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18th April 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
The petitioner, Shiva Ramanna Shetty, filed a writ petition on 23 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court noted …
Azam Aslam Butt filed a writ petition (No. 2427 of 2019) in the Bombay High Court on 24 April 2019. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
A writ petition (No. 2529 of 2019) was filed by Priyanka Santosh Shete against the State of Maharashtra and others. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner passed away. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court of the death and submitted that the petition stood abated. The court …
The petitioner, Shree Yamai Devi Charitable Trust, filed a writ petition on 3 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 2 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for any hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel showed no interest in pursuing the matter. On this basis, the court held that the …
Meena Bhimanand Sonavane filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 3 May 2019. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither she nor her counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 7 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this …
The petitioner, Jalinder Mahadev Dhekale, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioner, Dhiren Dungarshi Shah, filed a writ petition on 5 April 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The court noted that since filing, the petitioner and his advocate made no effort to advance or circulate the petition. It …
A writ petition was filed on 16 May 2019 by Hafiz Abdul Bari Khan against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 16 May 2019 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution. No substantive …
Mohd Shahjad Mallik filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was examined by a two‑judge bench. The court observed that, owing to the passage of time, the cause of action for filing the petition had become …
Kunda Kulkarni filed a writ petition on 17 May 2019 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 May 2019 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the record shows that the petition was never circulated or pursued. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in continuing …
The petitioner, Rajendra Sadashiv Nikalje, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 3, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Rekha Mistry filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 27 November 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Ravsaheb Dattu Shingate, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after July 1, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Ujwla Santosh Yede, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after July 24, 2019. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the petition could …
Ramdulare Murat Sharma filed Writ Petition No. 2828 of 2019 on 16 May 2019 against Senior Inspector of Police and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The Court observed that the petitioner appeared …
Sunil Koksingh Rajput filed writ petition No. 2836 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after 21st December 2021, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 3 May 2019 in the Bombay High Court. They failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the court …
The petitioner, Aruna Prashant Chakraborti, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 but failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. As a …
The petitioner, Syed Hasan Madaar, filed a writ petition on 15 April 2019 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The Court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief. The issue …
The petitioner, Aanchal Dharmendra Sajnani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 17, 2019, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 20 June 2019 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and took no steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. The respondents, represented by Ashish I. Satpute, argued …
Petitioner Dhiraj Singh filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and, after March 5, 2020, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. The issue …
The petitioner, Dr. Deepali Pankaj Athavale, filed a writ petition on 17 June 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or her counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 24 June 2019 but failed to appear for the hearing and took no steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
The petitioner, Anil Premchand Kanjani, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court record shows that after 25 February 2020, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It appears the petitioner was not …
The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after October 9, 2019. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
Rashida Abdul Majid Ansari filed writ petition No. 3546 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 15 March 2021, neither she nor her counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Nitin Ashok Maniyar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition, stating it had become infructuous. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Kalpesh Piyush Sanghavi filed a writ petition on 18 July 2019 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the matter. …
Janardhan Abaso Kedari filed a writ petition (No. 3753 of 2019) in the High Court of Bombay against the Commissioner of Police, Pune City and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called out for hearing. The record shows that after 28 August 2019 neither the petitioner nor his advocate took …
Avarsekar Realty Private Limited filed Writ Petition No. 3763 of 2019 in the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 14 August 2019, neither the petitioner nor its counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court …
Aishwarya Yogesh Joshi filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 14 January 2019 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The Court …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 14 January 2019 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any hearing, and the court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested …
The petitioner, Chandan Chittaranjan Sharma, filed a writ petition on 27 March 2019 in the Bombay High Court. Neither the petitioner nor his counsel appeared for the hearing nor took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Baig Salim Abdul Razzak filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging his detention. The State of Maharashtra, through its Additional Public Prosecutor, informed the Court that the petitioner had already been released after serving his entire sentence. The Court examined whether the …
The petitioners, Devidas Ganpat Kuchekar & Ors., were directed by the High Court on 17 June 2026 to deposit a cost of Rs.10,000 each with the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa's Advocate Academy and Research Center. On the petition, they submitted electronic receipts and a UPI transaction …
The petitioner, Sagar Sanjay Garud, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Manmad City Police Station and others. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through his counsel Mr. Virendra V. Pethe, communicated that he no longer wished to pursue the petition. The …
Gorakh Hiraman Jadhav filed Civil Writ Petition No. 1994 of 2026 in the High Court of Bombay challenging the actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing. The respondents were represented by Smt. Neha Bhide and Smt. Leena Patil. The Court …
The High Court of Bombay dismissed the writ petition filed by Samyak Welfare Association on the ground of non‑prosecution. The petitioner failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after March 4, 2019, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 2 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record showed that the petitioner made no effort to advance the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested …
The petitioner, Lalita Chunnilal Nayak, filed a writ petition but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after July 30, 2018. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court considered whether the …
The petitioner, Shevantibai Yashwant Barad, failed to appear for the hearing of her writ petition and, according to the record, made no effort to advance the petition since its filing on 17 May 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, …
Abdul Afsar Salam Khan filed an appeal (No. 424 of 2026) before the Bombay High Court against the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court, comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, issued a notice to respondents numbered 2 to 6, directing that it be returned by 24 July 2026. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court, but after February 7, 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges noted the lack of …
The petitioner, Pradeep Nanubhai Paghdal, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after April 15, 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the …
The Bombay High Court, in Writ Petition No. 2872 of 2018, issued a procedural order directing the Registry to comply with a prior order dated 24 July 2018. The court instructed that compliance be effected within two weeks from the date of the order, i.e., by 26 June 2026. The order also directed the …
Petitioners Chetan Narendra Dhakan & Ors filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court. During the proceedings, they applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave, ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, and consequently disposed of …
Petitioner Kishore Shankar Singnapurkar filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later informed the Court that the petition had become infructuous. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the petition as infructuous, without …
The petitioner, Hanumant Govind Chandgude, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 8 April 2019, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance or circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
Writ Petition No. 3504 of 2018 was filed by Kamruddin Ibrahim Teli before the High Court of Bombay challenging a matter in the criminal appellate jurisdiction. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner passed away. Counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vaibhav Ugle, informed the Court of this …
The petitioners, Jagmohan Ramdittamal Vhora & Anr., filed a writ petition (No. 3551 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing and, after 14 August 2018, neither they nor their counsel took any steps to …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 9 August 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioners filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court noted that after September 18, 2018, neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. It was observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 14 August 2018 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for any hearing, and the record shows that the petition was never circulated or pursued after filing. The court observed that the …
The petitioner, Jay Chetan Dhruava, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner, through Advocate Pravin Uttam Gaikwak, sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court, comprising Justices A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata, considered the request. The Court granted …
The petitioner, Vilas Suryakant Mayekar, filed a writ petition on 16 August 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 21 August 2018 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
A writ petition was filed on 21 August 2018 by Abdul Razzak Mohd. Idris Shaikh seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Hemant Anil Shukla, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after December 17, 2018, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court …
The petitioner, Ali Razak Parvez Irani, filed a writ petition on 7 September 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 12 June 2026. The court observed that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or …
The petitioner, Siddhesh Basveshwar Hiremath, filed a writ petition on 14 September 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at any subsequent hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition or pursue the matter. It …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 18 September 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner at the hearing and the record shows that neither the petitioner nor his counsel circulated the petition even once after filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Mukesh Manubhai Vashi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Commissioner of Police and others. The petitioner’s counsel subsequently applied to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted leave for the withdrawal. The petition was …
The petitioner, Swapnil Shantikumar Ovalekar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 8 January 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested …
The petitioner, Swapnil Pandurang, filed a writ petition on 25 September 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The court noted that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. It was observed that the …
The petitioner, Mohammad Zahid Shaikh, filed a writ petition on 29 September 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 12 June 2026. The court record showed that the petitioner had not taken any steps to circulate or pursue the …
National Spot Exchange Ltd. and another filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a matter before the State of Maharashtra. The petitioners, through counsel Ms. Jalpa Shah of MZM Legal LLP, sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The court considered the request and, …
The petitioner, Disha K. Pajai, filed a writ petition on 8 October 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief …
The petitioner, Mohmed Firoz Shamsuddin Usmani, filed a writ petition on 8 October 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared for the petitioner at the hearing and the petitioner failed to take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court and subsequently sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the petitioner's request for leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
The petitioner, Dinesh Chimanlal Shah, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The record shows that after 29 October 2018 the petitioner and his advocate made no effort to circulate the petition. …
The petitioner, Shreeram Taksande, filed a writ petition on 20 October 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 12 June 2026. The court noted that the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue the petition since …
Poonam Chambers filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a mandamus directing the police to register an FIR based on a complaint dated 23 December 2017, invoking the principles laid down in State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal and Lalita Kumari v. State of UP. The High Court examined the petition …
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the court to order the lodging of a criminal case based on a complaint dated 24 September 2018. The High Court examined the petition in light of the Supreme Court’s recent judgment in Sujal Vishwas Attavar & Anr. v. …
The petitioner, Dilip Ankush Wakkar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The petitioner, Vidyadhar s/o Govind Telang, filed a writ petition on 14 November 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing, and no steps were taken to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 2 November 2018 but failed to appear at the hearing. The record shows that neither the petitioners nor their counsel took any steps to circulate the petition after filing. The court observed that the petitioners appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Ishrat Ali Shaikh, filed a writ petition on 21 April 2018 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 12 June 2026. The court noted that the petitioner had not …
The petitioner, Haresh Murjibhai Patel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking the court to order the lodging of a crime by taking cognizance of a complaint dated 26 October 2018. The petition was filed in the High Court of Bombay's Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction. The …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 29 November 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No counsel appeared for the petitioner at the hearing and the petitioner failed to take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 December 2018 but failed to appear at any subsequent hearing. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to circulate or pursue the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 19 December 2018 in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 17 October 2018 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for the hearing on 12 June 2026. The court noted that the petitioners had made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition …
Primezone Developers Ltd., a real‑estate company, had its two residential projects attached under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishments) Act (MPID Act) after alleged tainted funds were invested by Mr. Ranjeev Agarwal, who was later arrested in the NSEL …
Primezone Developers Ltd., a real‑estate company, had its two residential projects attached under the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (MPID) Act after alleged money‑laundering by its former chairman, Mr. Ranjeev Agarwal, who had invested tainted NSEL funds into the company. The …
The appellant, Sishirkumar Padhy, was convicted for murder (IPC 302) and criminal intimidation (IPC 452) after a woman was stabbed in her home. He claimed he had tried to chase the assailant and reported the incident to police, but the trial court relied on CCTV footage, recovered weapons, a dying …
The petitioners challenged the FIR (CR No. 88 of 2011) filed by Rohit Jadhav and the Indapur Winery Society alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust over a wine supply agreement with Champagne Indage Ltd. The petitioners argued that the FIR lacked specific particulars, did not disclose any …
The applicant, Yogesh Kailas Jadhav, sought bail and suspension of his life sentence under Section 415 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pending appeal against a conviction for murder and related offences. The trial court had found him guilty of IPC sections 302, 323, 498A, 504 and …
The applicant, Hiraman Mahadu Mali, filed an interim application seeking condonation of a 49‑day delay in filing an appeal against his conviction. The application was presented through Ms. Manisha Devkar, appointed by the Legal Aid Committee, on behalf of Mr. Shankar Katkar. The State of Maharashtra …
The petitioner, M/s. Bhosale Homes, challenged a Stop Work Notice issued by CIDCO, arguing that the circular underpinning the notice was not retrospective. CIDCO contended the notice was based on a 2012 letter indicating the petitioner was not the landowner. The High Court had earlier held that the …
The petitioner, Madhavi Sachin Sirsat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after 20 April 2018, the petitioner or his counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court inferred that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Mohammed Ishtiaque Ebrahi Bagban, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after November 25, 2019, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioners, Kapadia Development Co‑op. Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition on 29 January 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioners failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The Court observed that the petitioners appeared …
The petitioners filed Writ Petition No.447 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court. After the hearing on 28th February 2018, the petitioners and/or their counsel failed to appear for subsequent hearings and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioners appeared …
The petitioner, Mr. Rajendrakumar Kalicharan Verma, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear when called for hearing. The court record shows that after 28 January 2016 the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition even once. The court inferred that the …
The petitioner, Ketan Chugh, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case were …
The petitioner, Tajpal Dungarji Patidar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The record shows that after July 6, 2017, the petitioner or his counsel made no effort to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Jaikumar Laxmandas Jhula, filed a writ petition on 31 January 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No further steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, including any circulation of the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested …
The petitioner, Puran Karansingh Das, filed Writ Petition No. 608 of 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 26 April 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Hamid Gani Shah, filed a writ petition seeking a direction for further investigation into a crime for which a charge-sheet had been filed in 2019. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on behalf of the State, submitted that the investigation was complete. The High Court examined …
The petitioners, M/s S. B. Associates and Construction Co., filed a writ petition on 8 February 2018. No steps were taken by the petitioners or their counsel to circulate or pursue the petition after filing. The petitioners failed to appear when called for hearing. The court observed that the …
The petitioner, Dhammpal Kaduba Dandge, filed a writ petition on 9 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. Despite the filing, the petitioner failed to appear for the scheduled hearing and made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel had …
The petitioners filed a writ petition (No. 554 of 2018) and a related criminal application (No. 62 of 2018) before the Bombay High Court. After February 22, 2018, the petitioners and their counsel failed to take any steps to circulate the petition or appear before the court. The court observed that …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 16 February 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No petitioner appeared when called for hearing, and the record shows that the petitioners or their counsel made no effort to circulate the petition at any time. The court observed that the petitioners appeared …
The petitioner, Madhavi Sachin Sirsat, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2018 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioner, Manohar Dhondu Karnuk, filed a writ petition on 24 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026. The court noted that since filing, neither the petitioner nor his counsel had taken any steps to circulate or pursue …
The petitioner, Piyush Tripathi, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was …
The petitioner, Denis C. Lobo, filed Writ Petition No. 976 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 27 February 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing. The record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Ramling S/o Narsappa Deshmane, filed Writ Petition No.1104 of 2018 before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner, through Advocate Abdullah Shaikh, sought leave to withdraw the petition unconditionally. The Court considered the request and, after hearing, granted leave to withdraw. …
The petitioner, Nitin Ravindranath Patil, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court against the Bhiwandi City Police Station and others. The court noted that after 12 February 2018 the petitioner or his counsel made no effort to circulate the petition or appear for hearing. The record …
Rekha Dnyaneshwar Kunte filed a writ petition on 23 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 25 January 2018 in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No petitioner or their counsel appeared for any hearing after filing. The court noted that the petitioners made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition. It was …
The petitioner, Dwarkanath Namdev Patil, filed a writ petition on 9 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. No further action was taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, including failure to circulate it for hearing. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in …
The petitioner, Abdul Nayeem Kayyum Khan, filed a writ petition on 16 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. No counsel appeared for the petitioner at the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026, and the court record shows that neither the petitioner nor his …
This is a criminal writ petition filed by Sunanda Suresh Patil against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition was filed on 26th March 2018. When the matter was called out for hearing, none appeared for the petitioner. The record showed that since the date of filing, the petitioner and/or …
The petitioner, Mohammed Sharif Abdulla Shaikh, filed a writ petition on 26 March 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petition was scheduled for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to circulate or pursue the petition …
The petitioner, Usman Gani Hussain Rathod, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. Counsel for the petitioner sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 April 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the …
The petitioners, Laxmi Mandhawani and others, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code before the trial court. The High Court examined whether such withdrawal with the said liberty could …
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Deepak Dada Khatal on 17 April 2018 because the petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and made no effort to pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel did not circulate the petition even once, …
M/s. Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd. filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after 27 January 2025, did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Taraben Navinbhai Barot, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after September 24, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
A writ petition was filed by C. S. Ravi Narayan. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 October 2018. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 5 May 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the petition on the ground of …
The petitioner, Sudhir Popatlal Kotak, filed a writ petition after the police had already filed a charge‑sheet. He sought leave to withdraw the petition and instead file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code for further investigation. The Court granted the leave, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 22 February 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner and her counsel failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 28 May 2018 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 28 May 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner when the matter was called for hearing. The court noted that the petitioner and his counsel made no effort to circulate or pursue the petition since its filing. It was observed …
The petitioner, Sachin Babarao Kale, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The parties subsequently settled the dispute amicably. The petitioner’s counsel sought leave to withdraw the petition, which the court granted. The petition was consequently withdrawn and the matter disposed of. No …
The petitioner, Bhairulal Hiralalji Chowdhari, filed a writ petition on 5 June 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
A writ petition was filed on 12 April 2018 by Chandrakant Baban Bidkar seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to advance the petition since its filing. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Sagar Maruti Suryawanshi, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
Amit Rajkumar Singhania filed Writ Petition No.2540 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court against the Union of India. The petitioner failed to appear when called for hearing and, after 19 July 2017, took no steps to circulate the petition. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions (Nos. 2726 of 2018 and 2429 of 2018) because the petitioner, Umesh Motwani, failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petitions after March 2019. The court noted that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the …
Petitioner Asiya Begam filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. During proceedings, her counsel stated on 16 June 2022 that she had no objection to the appointment of Mr. Gharat as Special Public Prosecutor to conduct her case. The Court held that this unequivocal statement …
The petitioner, Mohd. Siddhiq Haji, failed to appear for the hearing and, after July 23, 2019, made no effort to circulate the writ petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the judges considered whether the petition could continue …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing and, since October 2018, made no effort to circulate the petition. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented …
The petitioners filed an interim application seeking amendment of Arbitration Appeal No. 53 of 2023, which was still at the pre‑admission stage. The respondents opposed the amendment, filing a detailed affidavit. The court examined the application and noted that the appeal had not yet been admitted. …
The petitioner, Shivpratap Ramnivas Maurya, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner’s counsel applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Gulfam Ahmed Samani, filed a writ petition on 6 July 2018 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the scheduled hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court noted that the …
HCL Services Ltd. filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court on 22 September 2016 challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The Court examined whether the petitioner's cause of action still existed. It concluded that the cause of action had ceased to exist, rendering the petition …
The petitioner, Idris Abdul Hamid Shaikh, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, after December 3, 2018, neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner, Ganesh Laxman Lagas, filed a writ petition on 17 July 2018 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner did not take any steps to circulate the petition after …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ramesh Bhalerao, filed a writ petition on 20 July 2018 challenging the actions of the Director of Higher Education and others. The petition was listed for hearing, but the petitioner failed to appear. The court noted that neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps …
Ganesh Investments & Financial Technics Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging a criminal matter. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time. The Court examined whether the cause of action still existed. It held that the passage of time had extinguished the …
The petitioner, Ganesh Investments & Financial Technics Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition challenging a decision of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed after a considerable lapse of time since the alleged cause of action arose. The Court examined whether the petition remained maintainable …
The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Ankit Nitin Palekar after the petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not circulate the petition after February 10, 2021. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition …
The petitioner, Sachin Sopanrao Vede, filed Writ Petition No. 3199 of 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the Investigation Officer and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after March 7, 2018. …
The petitioners, Laxmi Mandhawani and others, filed a writ petition seeking leave to withdraw the petition and obtain liberty to file an application under Section 173(8) of the Criminal Procedure Code before the trial court. The High Court examined whether such withdrawal with the said liberty could …
M/s. Fiabrecom Industries Limited, represented by its proprietor Bilal Husain Namrah, filed a writ petition (No. 3291 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The petition was filed on 14 August 2017, but the court observed that neither the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 10 August 2017. Since filing, the petitioner and her counsel failed to appear for any hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. On this basis, the court …
Petitioner Laxman Madhavdas Harwani filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 3 December 2019. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
The petitioner, Bapu Prabhakar Nair, filed a writ petition on 18 August 2017 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the court …
The petitioner Diwakar Sinha filed a writ petition on 18 August 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel at the hearing scheduled on 18 April 2026. The court noted that since filing, the petitioner had taken no steps to circulate or pursue the …
The petitioner, Ravindra Chandrakant Chiplunkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 24 August 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioner, Rachna Puri, filed a writ petition challenging an investigation. The petitioner’s counsel informed the Court that the police had already filed a closure report in the case. The Court held that the filing of the closure report rendered the petition infructuous. Consequently, the …
Nagina Hasan filed Writ Petition No. 3438 of 2013 in the Bombay High Court challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 October 2018. The court …
Mahesh Chandrakant Zagade filed a writ petition on 12 August 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No petitioner or his counsel appeared when called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner made no effort to circulate the petition since its filing. The court inferred that the petitioner …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to take any steps to circulate the petition after November 1, 2017. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the judges concluded that the petition was effectively …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 15 September 2017 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner’s apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for …
The petitioner, Ananda Baban Sable, filed a writ petition on 15 September 2017. No steps were taken by the petitioner or his counsel to advance the petition, and the petitioner did not appear for hearing. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. …
The petitioner, Rohit Phadtare, failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the writ petition after July 4, 2018, indicating a lack of interest in pursuing the case. The respondents, represented by Smt. P. P. Shinde, highlighted this inactivity. The Court examined …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief, but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 18, 2015. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Umesh Kailesh Athani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The court record shows that after 8 November 2017, neither the petitioner nor his counsel took any steps to advance the petition. The court observed that the petitioner …
The petitioner, Manish Hansraj Jain, filed a writ petition on 29 September 2017 in the High Court of Bombay. No appearance was made by the petitioner or his counsel when the matter was called for hearing. The court record shows that the petitioner did not take any steps to circulate the petition …
The petitioners, Edit Guru, filed a writ petition (No. 4081 of 2017) before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The court noted that after 14 November 2017, the petitioner and its counsel made no effort to circulate the petition even once. It was …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after December 6, 2017. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the petition. Consequently, the court dismissed the …
M/s Jay Gurudev Realty filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 6 December 2018. The court noted that the …
The petitioners filed a writ petition on 25 September 2017 but failed to take any steps to circulate or pursue the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioners and their counsel did not appear for hearing and appeared uninterested in continuing the proceedings. On this basis, the court …
The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra, but their counsel reported that no further instructions were received. The court noted that after 26 November 2018, neither the petitioners nor their advocate took any steps to advance the petitions. It appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition on 6 October 2017 but failed to appear for hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court noted the petitioner's apparent lack of interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.
The petitioner, Sundarabai Govardhan Patil, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition after February 13, 2018. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
Majula Baban Jadhav filed a writ petition on 13 November 2017 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition since its filing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared …
The petitioner filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court but failed to appear for the hearing. The record shows that after August 7, 2018, the petitioner or her counsel did not take any steps to circulate the petition even once. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in …
Petitioner Baghu Budhiyabhai Halpati filed a writ petition challenging actions of the Union Territory of Dadra and Nagar Haveli and others. The Court examined whether the cause of action for the petition still existed. It concluded that the cause of action no longer survived. Consequently, the …
The petitioner, Wasim Akram Alihasan Ansari, filed a writ petition on 24 November 2017 in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to advance the petition thereafter. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the …
The petitioner, Sanjay Ramchand Chhabaria, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, did not take any steps to circulate the petition after 8 July 2019. The …
The petitioner, Raosaheb Dagdu Chougule, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner, through Advocate R. Sathyanarayanan, later applied for unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court, comprising Justices A.S. …
The petitioner filed a writ petition (No. 384 of 2018) and a related criminal application (No. 501 of 2018) in the Bombay High Court. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after 23 October 2018, indicating a lack of …
The petitioner, Siddharth P. Shah, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court. The petitioner’s counsel sought unconditional leave to withdraw the petition. The Court granted the leave to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the case …
The petitioners, Reliance Retail Ltd. and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 28 February 2017 passed by a judicial authority. The respondents, the Controller of Rationing and Director Civil Supplies, opposed the petition. The Court held …
